Topic started by Paulos (@ 209.167.202.210) on Mon Sep 22 15:02:33 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

can any one tell me if this is available ?

I dont know how many will be interested in listening to Tirukural on CD or Tape?

Responses:

• Old responses
  
• From: dasvie (@ jianying) on: Thu Nov 11 23:34:46 EST 2004
  
  ranga samy first of all you are a dravidian. u dont know what is the meaning of the term dravidian and u write some shitty things.
  even dravidians were brahmins before 1000 yrs. u have to know that
  
  
• From: dasvie (@ jianying) on: Thu Nov 11 23:34:59 EST 2004
  
  ranga samy you are a dravidian. u dont know what is the meaning of the term dravidian and u write some shitty things.
  even dravidians were brahmins before 1000 yrs. u have to know that
  
  
• From: black (@ 24.109.128.230) on: Sat Nov 13 12:18:09 EST 2004
  
  Actually the problem with whole tamil culture. The discussion is all surrounding brahmins-non brahmins, aryans, dravids, hinduism , vedas, thirukural, anti-hindi, white, black.
  Actually Tamils are inferior in all the subjects, they have no history, no culture, no good langauge so all these trouble, and so is this forum. Tamil is basically a rogue community, that is the reason they keep on fighting among themselves, with neighbours like srilanka,karnataka, kerala, with country like india. with white skinned people, with brahmins etc etc.
  No one can help these dirty pigs.
  
  
• From: davie (@ tandon-lpt) on: Tue Nov 16 03:23:52 EST 2004
  
  @truth pichakara
  i saw one picture of a brahmin in yahoo profiles. his name is harish kumar.
  
  he looks just like any south indian. i will never rate him as a brahmin. But just because of his virtue of birth he claims to be a brahmin.
  I can never digest the fact that he is opposing non brahmins. I really hate some locals posting something like that. they pay some 5 rupees(0.1$) to the internet and post something opposing their own race.
  
  ifu look like hrithik roshan or aishwarya roy, u can say that other indians are black. if u are just a local purukki nai and u post something i can never accept this
  beware ppurukkis and rogues from local india i dont want to waste my time for you all
  EVERY ONE IS NICE
  I HAVE (MOST OF TAMILPEOPLE) HAVE NORTHIE FRIENDS, WHITE FRIENDS, EVERYONE LIKES INDIANS ESPECIALY DARK INDIANS.
  
  
  
  
• From: davie (@ laptop1) on: Wed Nov 17 16:11:01 EST 2004
  
  and for rangsmi and truth
  shudras were business men
  khastrias were warriors
  etc
  they are just the professions of people
  valmiki (the brahmin who wrote ramayana) is a brahmin who had conflicts with khastrias. especially khastrias of the south india.
  So, he wrote his story biasing facts against south indiankings. He did not like dark looking people. so he jsut gave some imaginary name calling monkeys. But again ravana was a khastria. no big deal that mother fukr valmiki calling ravana as asura.
  
  butthe fact is southies (non brahmins) were khastrias,vaishyas and shudras. I posted my damn good argument before 6 months that valmiki is biased. And one of my close friend madhu (a brahmin) BEFORE FIVE YEARS he used to talk to me about ramayana and why hanuman (god) is assumed a monkeys figure. I call ramayana is a story and is not 100% true facts cos its written there that hanman can fly. its weird. no humancan flyd
  
  
• From: davie (@ laptop1) on: Wed Nov 17 16:12:40 EST 2004
  
  all arguments to this issue are invited :)
  
  
• From: davie (@ 3p.ecc.utep.edu) on: Fri Nov 19 17:57:37 EST 2004
  
  well ramayana is not biased
  valmiki eventhough he is a brahmin has written about ravana who was a brahmin in srilanka. any evil person is called asura example, ravana eventhough he is a brahmin is called asura because of his character. Brahmnis with asura like characters deserve to be killed. in this forum someone called truth
  
  
• From: davie (@ laptop1) on: Sat Nov 20 06:44:36 EST 2004
  
  
  lol
  in the context of ramayana, we are the gods (khastrias) aand u brahmins should worship us.
  
  Coz, u know that brahmin lady surpanaka (sister of brahmin ravana) just wanted to marry rama and rama said no because she was ugly and also he had alreay married sita.
  
  So ramas brother cut surpanaka (brahmins ladys) nose.
  lol.
  only because of this ravana the brahmin king just abducted sita.lol.
  U BRAHMINS ARE SO STUPID THAT U DESERVE TO BE KILLED. U ARE THE DEMONS.
  
  rama was a kshatria. Well as i gave u all a rigorous proof about who is a kshatria in india (especially north and south). I dont know about north, but in south we (non brahmins) are were the kshatrias. Gods and idols are dark in south india.
  
  brahmins worship rama and oppose the devil (the brahmin ravana).
  
  Why dont u (brahmins) all stop being like ravana and just worship us (non brahmins like rama)???
  
  

Want to post a response?