US declares war on terrorism while Suicide Tiger killers roam free in Canada
Topic started by Rg (@ proxy2.uq.edu.au) on Mon Sep 24 04:55:51 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.
US declares war on terrorism while Suicide Tiger killers roam free in Canada
Sept 22, CP-FEATURE
The death knell for global terrorism has been clearly sounded.
US President George W. Bush told Congress, the US and the world Thursday night that the US effort to fight terrorism will not cease "until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated." In his hard-hitting speech, he said that the global outreach of terrorist networks include thousands of operatives in more than 60 countries.
"Freedom and fear are at war," he said. But he was never firmer. "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists," he told an attentive global audience.
Sri Lanka, a country torn apart by terrorism as the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) drained the blood of its youth and devastated its property and wealth over the past eighteen years, is obviously at the forefront of the war against terrorism.
President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunge in her message to President Bush said, "Sri Lanka stands fully committed to support all international initiatives in pursuit of this objective."
Foreign Minister Lakshman Kadirgamar in his message to Secretary of State Colin Powell said, "The time has come for the international community to close ranks and to take practical and meaningful action to eradicate terrorism. Sri Lanka as always stands ready to work closely with the United States and the rest of the international community towards the realisation of this objective."
With the horrifying images of suicide killers ramming planes into the World Trade Centre in New York and the Pentagon in Washington DC fresh in mind, global attention is naturally focused on suicide bombers and suicide killers and how they breed.
Enter the Tamil Tigers as the most notorious of suicide killers in the world.
Terrorism expert Rohan Gunaratna identifies 10 groups actively using suicide as a weapon: two centered in Israeli-occupied lands, two in Egypt and one each in Lebanon, Algeria, India, Sri Lanka, Turkey and Afghanistan.
However, two-thirds of global suicide attacks have been committed not by fundamentalists but by the Tamil Tigers. The latest attack against Sri Lanka's Navy was the 66th high-profile suicide bombing carried out by the Tamil Tigers, when they launched a sea-borne suicide attack against a ship ferrying some 1,200 government troops. In June this year, the LTTE's clandestine Voice of Tigers radio said 217 suicide bombers known as "Black Tigers" were among some 17,211 of their fighters who have died since the first terrorist was killed in November 1982. The LTTE's first suicide bombing was staged by a Tamil Tiger known as Captain Miller who drove a truck packed with explosives into an army camp at Nelliyadi in the Jaffna peninsula on July 5, 1987, killing himself and 39 soldiers.
The LTTE has made suicide bombing an article of faith, with the Black Tigers the most honoured members of the organisation, entitled to one last meal with Prabhakaran himself before setting out on their missions. LTTE motivation for suicide attacks seems to be a kind of en masse cult hysteria as it consciously cultivates rituals like Martyr's Week, promoting a cult of martyrdom, building of special cemeteries, naming weapons after Black Tigers - in short, promising honour after death. This is attractive to those who have nothing to gain in life and with most Tamil Tigers being from lower middle class backgrounds, they easily accept such propaganda.
Another powerful motivation for the LTTE's suicide cadre is an ideology that judiciously uses symbols rooted in Tamil myth, such as the tiger which is the symbol of a favourite Tamil god Murugan.
Thus, they have nearly perfected this inhuman act by invoking martyrdom and recognition by God, if they killed and somehow brought God’s blessings into the act.
From another perspective, how do suicide terrorists like the LTTE survive without international support? The sad truth is there are countries that still harbour such terror groups.
As Richard Perle, a former U.S. Assistant Secretary of Defence, says, "Those countries that harbour terrorists -- that provide the means with which they would destroy innocent civilians -- must themselves be destroyed. The war against terrorism is about the war against those regimes. We will not win the war against terror by chasing individual terrorists... It is the networks that send young men on suicide missions and their sponsors that must be destroyed."
The US banned the LTTE as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation in October 1997. In February 2001, the UK followed suit. The LTTE is also proscribed in Sri Lanka, India and Malaysia.
Canada, however, is a country that has refused to listen.
Recently, in the Canadian parliament, Alliance MPs accused the Liberals of having been soft on terrorism and allowing front organizations of terrorists like the Tamil Tigers to operate and fundraise in Canada, fearing that cracking down on them would offend supporters in ethnic communities.
The 1999 United Nations Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism calls on states "to take steps to prevent and counteract, through appropriate domestic measures, the financing of terrorists and terrorist organizations."
Canada signed the UN convention in February 2000 but the required Criminal Code amendments have not come forth. The Canadian Jewish Congress last February called on Canada to implement the convention. "Denying international terrorism its crucial financial lifelines is a key way to throttle it. The U.S. and U.K. already have outlawed terrorist fundraising. Canada, unfortunately, has yet to follow suit."
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service has repeatedly raised a warning flag about terrorist fundraising activities on Canadian soil. For instance, Canada has the largest population of Sri Lankan Tamils outside Sri Lanka. The Tamil Tigers are believed to raise anywhere from $1 million to $20 million a year within its expatriate community.
A senior Canadian Cabinet minister, speaking on condition of anonymity, warned that failure to harmonize Canada's immigration, customs and security laws soon -- including deportation procedures for refugee claimants with proven terrorist links -- could bring serious economic repercussions.
However, this week, Canadian Justice Minister Anne McLellan said a new anti-terrorism law is on its way in Canada after last week's attacks in the US, and the government may seek to revisit a Supreme Court case involving the deportation of suspected terrorists. New legal measures will "strike at the heart" of terrorist fundraising capabilities, the Minister said.
"Terrorism has a certain similarity to organized crime. What fuels it is money. And therefore what we have to do is strike at the ability of terrorist organizations to raise money," she said.
The federal government's first priority is to be new legislation allowing it to implement the 1999 United Nations convention which Canada has yet to ratify by making it a crime for people to knowingly fund terrorism.
Stockwell Day, the Canadian Alliance leader, repeated calls for tougher laws, including one to speed up the deportation of undesirables, even if they might face the death penalty in their homelands. The Alliance is also urging the government to name terrorist groups, seize their assets, ban fundraising and extradite anybody charged with terrorist offences. "The war against terrorism begins here, at home, in Canada," Mr. Day said.
The high court is expected to rule this fall on the fate of two suspected terrorists, Manickavasagam Suresh and Mansour Ahani, who argue they will be tortured if sent home to Sri Lanka and Iran, respectively.
Meanwhile, the Tami Tigers continue to fundraise on Canadian soil. Adiyar Vipulananda, a Hindu spiritual leader in Scarborough, furiously opposes aggressive fundraising tactics by Tamil Tigers in temples. However, opposition only brought him death threats. Many others like him want the Tigers out of the temples, he said, but are afraid of retaliation and believe the police cannot protect them. Tamil Tigers "misuse the freedom of Canada," he said.
"The LTTE raises money through drug trafficking. It also raises money by relying upon the willing or unwilling expatriate communities abroad, such as the large number of Tamil refugees in Canada," government lawyers wrote in a recent deportation case.
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service suspects that some of those donations come from organizations that show up at temple events to take donations and sell LTTE goods such as flags.
The newest twist in the Tamil Tiger suicide tale seems to be a desire to be hired killers. Some months ago Tamil Tigers were contracted to kill the Bangladeshi Prime Minister. The Uttar Pradesh government issued a high alert when intelligence reports revealed that two Tamil Tigers, one of them a France-based member of a suicide squad, were planning to sneak into the state to kill prominent political personalities. LTTE suicide bombers were to be paid $ 10 million rather than assign the French for half the amount. The logic was that the LTTE was more dependable and leaves behind no clues.
"There is no perfect security, just as there is no perfect intelligence," said David Harris, a former chief of strategic planning for the Canadian Security Intelligence Service.
What is more difficult to guard against than those who view sacrificial death as their ticket to heaven? Who more difficult to convince than those who embrace terrorists as freedom fighters?
Responses:
- Old responses
- From: Kittu (@ ac835cb4.ipt.aol.com)
on: Sat Jan 17 18:48:00 EST 2004
"We Indian people haver enough to blame for the success of this strong fighting force, since it was us who gave them the financial resources, the training grounds and the support when needed, so that we could "build" ourself an ally, when we needed it, since the Singhalese govt. in Sri Lanka was looking to Pakistan for a strategic partnership and China was alligned with Pakistan at that time as well. We Indians were in a tough spot and needed an ally in South Asia FAST. Looking at it now, it was a bad idea - but let's face it ....we at one time looked upon them as freedom fighters, and when the tide turned, we changed their face."
Get a grip on history, Indianpariah.
Sri Lanka only got close to Pakistan *after* the Indian govt. began to fund the SL Tamil militants. Indira Gandhi felt threatened that SL was getting close to the West, wanting to shed the failed Nehruvian socialistic model which it had carried almost since independence, and that is why she supported the separatists. Talk about Karma.. she herself was killed by separatists, and her son was murdered by the very 'freedom fighers' whom she funded!!! Ha ha stupid India sure learned the meaning of 'Poetic Justice!!!'
SL had to turn to a reliable country in the region which also had the most effective military.. and we know that India is certainly not this country. In summer 2000 when the fall of Jaffna seemed imminent, India offered to transport the SLA out of Jaffna. Pakistan on the other hand offered some multibarreled RPG launchers. Now, YOU tell me which country made a better ally? The SLA took those Paki weapons and as we can see the LTTE never took Jaffna. See how useless India is? The LTTE would never want to touch India even with a ten-foot pole... who wants be friends with a Loser?
- From: indian (@ 69.156.226.177)
on: Sat Jan 17 23:31:01 EST 2004
Think, India, Think
Sri Lanka is going through political turmoil caused by a constitutional crisis, whilst the Indian political arena is also tensed at the moment. The ruling BJP has achieved unexpected victories in the recently held state elections. At the same time the BJP’s allies in Tamil Nadu (DMK, MDMK and PMK) have severed their ties with the ruling coalition, citing the treatment meted out to Vaiko. These events have led to speculation about future coalitions both at the state and central government levels in India.
Political analysts observe that change in government in India does not result in a change in India’s foreign policy. This is not an exception to the international practice. However, we need to point out that the Sri Lankan Tamil community has been yearning for a change in India’s foreign policy for a long time.
The Sri Lankan Tamils have had political as well as cultural ties with India, especially South India, which dates backs thousands of years. These ties continued even after India gained independence from Britain. The relationship between Sri Lankan Tamils and India peaked during Mrs. Indira Gandhi’s last tenure, due to her visionary politics and her empathy towards the plight of the Sri Lankan Tamils.
The relations soured after the Indo Sri Lanka Accord, which was orchestrated as beneficial to the Sri Lankan Tamils, notwithstanding their non-participation. The Rajiv Gandhi regime’s failure to comprehend the Sri Lankan Tamil problem thoroughly and its lack of long-term vision drove hasty decisions which brought pain and destruction to all parties concerned. India would have reacted the same way the Sri Lankan Tamils reacted, had a foreign power imposed an accord like the Indo Sri Lanka Accord on itself. Therefore, any right-minded person would see the justification behind the Sri Lankan Tamil struggle against the imposition of the Indo Sri Lanka accord.
Addressing the Remembrance Day event in London recently, the LTTE’s Political Advisor and Chief Negotiator, Mr. Anton Balasingham, stated, "We would not act in anyway prejudicial to India’s geo-political, strategic and economic interests. We want to establish friendly relations with the Government of India. As such we are seeking a radical change in India’s attitude,"
The LTTE has always sought friendly relations with India. The LTTE leadership has maintained this position despite the politico military pressures imposed by India. LTTE did not waiver from this stance even when it succeeded both militarily and politically against the Sri Lankan government.
Mr.V.Prabakaran, addressing the masses at Sudumalai in the aftermath of the Indo Sri Lanka accord in August 1987, stated, “We love India. We love the Indian people. There is no question of us taking up arms against Indian soldiers." He reiterated the LTTE’s friendly stance towards India, despite making the obvious observation that the accord was not going to benefit the Tamil people.
Whilst criticising the flawed Indo Sri Lanka accord, the LTTE leader clearly expressed his friendliness towards India and its people. It should be noted that Mr. Prabakaran articulated that the LTTE and the Sri Lankan Tamils will never be a danger to the interests and sovereignty of India and its people 17 years ago.
Mr. Prabakaran reiterated this stance in the media conference he held at Kilinochchi in April last year. It is worth pointing out that the Politico-Military strength enjoyed by the LTTE in 1987 is vastly different from that it experienced in 2002. Therefore, despite the improvement in its Politico-Military profile, the LTTE supremo has maintained a steadfast policy of friendliness towards India.
It is also noteworthy that the LTTE initially sought Indian facilitation for the direct talks with the Sri Lankan government. The LTTE’s Chief Negotiator, Mr. Anton Balasingham, tried to seek India’s facilitation through direct and indirect channels. However, it is unfortunate that the present Indian government failed to react positively to these signals from the LTTE.
However, LTTE continued with its expression of friendly relations towards India.
Mr.V.Balakumar, one of LTTE’s senior political leaders underscored these sentiments again in one of his recent speeches. Expressing confidence that India would soon come to know the true position of the LTTE, Mr.Balakumar said that, if India comes forward to improve its relationship with sincere heart, the LTTE would be pleased. “The LTTE will not engage in activities that could disrupt the regional politics of India,” he said, adding that the LTTE leadership is also very keen to mend fences with India. Mr.Balakumaran commented that India had been using the LTTE’s freedom struggle for its political interests, but said that the LTTE would not engage in any confrontation with India or work against its interests
The LTTE and the Tamil people have been both vocal and consistent in their sincere friendliness towards India right throughout history. However, has the Sinhala nation expressed the same gratitude towards India? Have the Sinhala political parties behaved in a consistent manner towards India? What does the average Sinhala citizen think about India?
It is worth noting that, in contrast to the friendly relationship Tamils had with India, the Sinhalese have always expressed enmity towards India. Even after gaining independence from Britain, the Sinhala nation continued with its anti Indian sentiments. Sri Lanka entertained Political, Military and Economical relations with many anti Indian countries such as Pakistan and China. During the cold war era, whilst India was in the USSR camp, Sri Lanka sided with the USA.
It is sad to note that the Sinhala nation harboured enmity towards India and its people right throughout. It is worth remembering that the Sri Lankan government declared a public holiday to celebrate its cricket team's first ever test cricket win over India.
What is the reason for the opposition to the Indo Sri Lanka accord in the South? Whatever the problem it may be there should not an Indian invention and anti Indian sentiment is the major driving force behind these upheavals.
The Sinhala nation, which was so vociferous in its opposition to the Indian intervention in the Eighties, has been recently inviting India to intervene in the ethnic crisis. This is not because of a change in heart from the Sinhala nation. It is because of their desire to break the strength of the Tamil liberation struggle at any cost.
It is in this background I would like to analyse India’s foreign policy towards Sri Lanka.
India is a multi cultural, multi lingual and multi religious country. Its government considers itself as a true representative of these various factions of the society, which is a prudent policy. Indian government should perceive its neighbours through the concept of “pluralistic society” in the same way it perceives its own nation. Unfortunately the Indian government seems only interested in the well being of the Sinhala nation as far as the Sri Lankan conflict is concerned. Therefore India’s foreign policy towards Sri Lanka is biased towards Sinhala hegemony. India’s foreign policy should not be partial towards one side of the conflict; it should be neutral towards both societies. This change needs to happen in India’s foreign policy towards Sri Lanka.
If one takes a deeper look at the Sri Lankan Tamils' struggle for independence, it will be evident that the Tamil liberation struggle has to a certain extent enabled India to preserve its superpower status in the South Asian region. It is worth noting that it is because of the effective control the LTTE exercises over the NorthEast of the Island, both in the sea and land, anti Indian forces have not been able to penetrate India’s corridor. If not for the presence of the LTTE, the Sri Lankan government would have sold out the Island to anti Indian forces long time ago. Sri Lanka would have entered into the same defence agreements it is talking about and entering into with anti Indian forces and foreign troops would have occupied India’s corridor by now.
India should open its eyes to these realities and think. !!!!
The LTTE has clearly articulated their policy towards India consistently over a long period. The Tamil nation has been yearning for friendly relations with India, then and now. It is understandable that a super-regional power like India will have many issues to be concerned about. However, it is an undisputable fact that the LTTE has been the force which has transformed the Tamil nation living in the Island of Sri Lanka into a nation to be reckoned with. In this context, the LTTE leadership has been addressing various concerns India may have publicly, in a very articulate manner.
What are these concerns, which are being addressed by the LTTE leadership?
Ø LTTE does not want to harm the regional superpower status enjoyed by India
Ø LTTE is not against India’s sovereignty, the Indian nation or the Indian people at large.
Ø LTTE will not be an obstacle to India’s national interests.
Ø LTTE does not act against the geopolitical interests of India.
Ø LTTE does not want to hinder the economic well-being of India
Ø LTTE does not intend to cause any trouble in India’s domestic political scene.
In contrast the LTTE and its leadership is seeking and is willing to
Ø Maintain cordial relations with India.
Ø Consider India as a friendly neighbour
Ø For a change in India’s foreign policy towards achieving a friendly and cordial relationship with India.
India should accept the reasonable and justifiable aspiration of the LTTE. India should take necessary steps towards achieving this relationship. If India needs further clarification in any of its concerns, it should not hesitate to open a communication channel with the LTTE. Therefore, India should approach the LTTE diplomatically. This is the request of both the Tamil people and the LTTE Leadership. Hope this wish will materialise in 2004.
NB:
This article is a translation of the analysis broadcast on Melbourne's 3CR Tamil Voice on the 22nd December 2003. The Tamil version is published in www.tamilnaatham.com
Print "Think, India, Think"
Think, India, Think
by Sebsan (Melbourne); published January 16, 2004
Sri Lanka is going through political turmoil caused by a constitutional crisis, whilst the Indian political arena is also tensed at the moment. The ruling BJP has achieved unexpected victories in the recently held state elections. At the same time the BJP’s allies in Tamil Nadu (DMK, MDMK and PMK) have severed their ties with the ruling coalition, citing the treatment meted out to Vaiko. These events have led to speculation about future coalitions both at the state and central government levels in India.
Political analysts observe that change in government in India does not result in a change in India’s foreign policy. This is not an exception to the international practice. However, we need to point out that the Sri Lankan Tamil community has been yearning for a change in India’s foreign policy for a long time.
The Sri Lankan Tamils have had political as well as cultural ties with India, especially South India, which dates backs thousands of years. These ties continued even after India gained independence from Britain. The relationship between Sri Lankan Tamils and India peaked during Mrs. Indira Gandhi’s last tenure, due to her visionary politics and her empathy towards the plight of the Sri Lankan Tamils.
The relations soured after the Indo Sri Lanka Accord, which was orchestrated as beneficial to the Sri Lankan Tamils, notwithstanding their non-participation. The Rajiv Gandhi regime’s failure to comprehend the Sri Lankan Tamil problem thoroughly and its lack of long-term vision drove hasty decisions which brought pain and destruction to all parties concerned. India would have reacted the same way the Sri Lankan Tamils reacted, had a foreign power imposed an accord like the Indo Sri Lanka Accord on itself. Therefore, any right-minded person would see the justification behind the Sri Lankan Tamil struggle against the imposition of the Indo Sri Lanka accord.
Addressing the Remembrance Day event in London recently, the LTTE’s Political Advisor and Chief Negotiator, Mr. Anton Balasingham, stated, "We would not act in anyway prejudicial to India’s geo-political, strategic and economic interests. We want to establish friendly relations with the Government of India. As such we are seeking a radical change in India’s attitude,"
The LTTE has always sought friendly relations with India. The LTTE leadership has maintained this position despite the politico military pressures imposed by India. LTTE did not waiver from this stance even when it succeeded both militarily and politically against the Sri Lankan government.
Mr.V.Prabakaran, addressing the masses at Sudumalai in the aftermath of the Indo Sri Lanka accord in August 1987, stated, “We love India. We love the Indian people. There is no question of us taking up arms against Indian soldiers." He reiterated the LTTE’s friendly stance towards India, despite making the obvious observation that the accord was not going to benefit the Tamil people.
Whilst criticising the flawed Indo Sri Lanka accord, the LTTE leader clearly expressed his friendliness towards India and its people. It should be noted that Mr. Prabakaran articulated that the LTTE and the Sri Lankan Tamils will never be a danger to the interests and sovereignty of India and its people 17 years ago.
Mr. Prabakaran reiterated this stance in the media conference he held at Kilinochchi in April last year. It is worth pointing out that the Politico-Military strength enjoyed by the LTTE in 1987 is vastly different from that it experienced in 2002. Therefore, despite the improvement in its Politico-Military profile, the LTTE supremo has maintained a steadfast policy of friendliness towards India.
It is also noteworthy that the LTTE initially sought Indian facilitation for the direct talks with the Sri Lankan government. The LTTE’s Chief Negotiator, Mr. Anton Balasingham, tried to seek India’s facilitation through direct and indirect channels. However, it is unfortunate that the present Indian government failed to react positively to these signals from the LTTE.
However, LTTE continued with its expression of friendly relations towards India.
Mr.V.Balakumar, one of LTTE’s senior political leaders underscored these sentiments again in one of his recent speeches. Expressing confidence that India would soon come to know the true position of the LTTE, Mr.Balakumar said that, if India comes forward to improve its relationship with sincere heart, the LTTE would be pleased. “The LTTE will not engage in activities that could disrupt the regional politics of India,” he said, adding that the LTTE leadership is also very keen to mend fences with India. Mr.Balakumaran commented that India had been using the LTTE’s freedom struggle for its political interests, but said that the LTTE would not engage in any confrontation with India or work against its interests
The LTTE and the Tamil people have been both vocal and consistent in their sincere friendliness towards India right throughout history. However, has the Sinhala nation expressed the same gratitude towards India? Have the Sinhala political parties behaved in a consistent manner towards India? What does the average Sinhala citizen think about India?
It is worth noting that, in contrast to the friendly relationship Tamils had with India, the Sinhalese have always expressed enmity towards India. Even after gaining independence from Britain, the Sinhala nation continued with its anti Indian sentiments. Sri Lanka entertained Political, Military and Economical relations with many anti Indian countries such as Pakistan and China. During the cold war era, whilst India was in the USSR camp, Sri Lanka sided with the USA.
It is sad to note that the Sinhala nation harboured enmity towards India and its people right throughout. It is worth remembering that the Sri Lankan government declared a public holiday to celebrate its cricket team's first ever test cricket win over India.
What is the reason for the opposition to the Indo Sri Lanka accord in the South? Whatever the problem it may be there should not an Indian invention and anti Indian sentiment is the major driving force behind these upheavals.
The Sinhala nation, which was so vociferous in its opposition to the Indian intervention in the Eighties, has been recently inviting India to intervene in the ethnic crisis. This is not because of a change in heart from the Sinhala nation. It is because of their desire to break the strength of the Tamil liberation struggle at any cost.
It is in this background I would like to analyse India’s foreign policy towards Sri Lanka.
India is a multi cultural, multi lingual and multi religious country. Its government considers itself as a true representative of these various factions of the society, which is a prudent policy. Indian government should perceive its neighbours through the concept of “pluralistic society” in the same way it perceives its own nation. Unfortunately the Indian government seems only interested in the well being of the Sinhala nation as far as the Sri Lankan conflict is concerned. Therefore India’s foreign policy towards Sri Lanka is biased towards Sinhala hegemony. India’s foreign policy should not be partial towards one side of the conflict; it should be neutral towards both societies. This change needs to happen in India’s foreign policy towards Sri Lanka.
If one takes a deeper look at the Sri Lankan Tamils' struggle for independence, it will be evident that the Tamil liberation struggle has to a certain extent enabled India to preserve its superpower status in the South Asian region. It is worth noting that it is because of the effective control the LTTE exercises over the NorthEast of the Island, both in the sea and land, anti Indian forces have not been able to penetrate India’s corridor. If not for the presence of the LTTE, the Sri Lankan government would have sold out the Island to anti Indian forces long time ago. Sri Lanka would have entered into the same defence agreements it is talking about and entering into with anti Indian forces and foreign troops would have occupied India’s corridor by now.
India should open its eyes to these realities and think. !!!!
The LTTE has clearly articulated their policy towards India consistently over a long period. The Tamil nation has been yearning for friendly relations with India, then and now. It is understandable that a super-regional power like India will have many issues to be concerned about. However, it is an undisputable fact that the LTTE has been the force which has transformed the Tamil nation living in the Island of Sri Lanka into a nation to be reckoned with. In this context, the LTTE leadership has been addressing various concerns India may have publicly, in a very articulate manner.
What are these concerns, which are being addressed by the LTTE leadership?
Ø LTTE does not want to harm the regional superpower status enjoyed by India
Ø LTTE is not against India’s sovereignty, the Indian nation or the Indian people at large.
Ø LTTE will not be an obstacle to India’s national interests.
Ø LTTE does not act against the geopolitical interests of India.
Ø LTTE does not want to hinder the economic well-being of India
Ø LTTE does not intend to cause any trouble in India’s domestic political scene.
In contrast the LTTE and its leadership is seeking and is willing to
Ø Maintain cordial relations with India.
Ø Consider India as a friendly neighbour
Ø For a change in India’s foreign policy towards achieving a friendly and cordial relationship with India.
India should accept the reasonable and justifiable aspiration of the LTTE. India should take necessary steps towards achieving this relationship. If India needs further clarification in any of its concerns, it should not hesitate to open a communication channel with the LTTE. Therefore, India should approach the LTTE diplomatically. This is the request of both the Tamil people and the LTTE Leadership. Hope this wish will materialise in 2004.
NB:
This article is a translation of the analysis broadcast on Melbourne's 3CR Tamil Voice on the 22nd December 2003. The Tamil version is published in www.tamilnaatham.com
Think, India, Think
by Sebsan (Melbourne); published January 16, 2004
Sri Lanka is going through political turmoil caused by a constitutional crisis, whilst the Indian political arena is also tensed at the moment. The ruling BJP has achieved unexpected victories in the recently held state elections. At the same time the BJP’s allies in Tamil Nadu (DMK, MDMK and PMK) have severed their ties with the ruling coalition, citing the treatment meted out to Vaiko. These events have led to speculation about future coalitions both at the state and central government levels in India.
Political analysts observe that change in government in India does not result in a change in India’s foreign policy. This is not an exception to the international practice. However, we need to point out that the Sri Lankan Tamil community has been yearning for a change in India’s foreign policy for a long time.
The Sri Lankan Tamils have had political as well as cultural ties with India, especially South India, which dates backs thousands of years. These ties continued even after India gained independence from Britain. The relationship between Sri Lankan Tamils and India peaked during Mrs. Indira Gandhi’s last tenure, due to her visionary politics and her empathy towards the plight of the Sri Lankan Tamils.
The relations soured after the Indo Sri Lanka Accord, which was orchestrated as beneficial to the Sri Lankan Tamils, notwithstanding their non-participation. The Rajiv Gandhi regime’s failure to comprehend the Sri Lankan Tamil problem thoroughly and its lack of long-term vision drove hasty decisions which brought pain and destruction to all parties concerned. India would have reacted the same way the Sri Lankan Tamils reacted, had a foreign power imposed an accord like the Indo Sri Lanka Accord on itself. Therefore, any right-minded person would see the justification behind the Sri Lankan Tamil struggle against the imposition of the Indo Sri Lanka accord.
Addressing the Remembrance Day event in London recently, the LTTE’s Political Advisor and Chief Negotiator, Mr. Anton Balasingham, stated, "We would not act in anyway prejudicial to India’s geo-political, strategic and economic interests. We want to establish friendly relations with the Government of India. As such we are seeking a radical change in India’s attitude,"
The LTTE has always sought friendly relations with India. The LTTE leadership has maintained this position despite the politico military pressures imposed by India. LTTE did not waiver from this stance even when it succeeded both militarily and politically against the Sri Lankan government.
Mr.V.Prabakaran, addressing the masses at Sudumalai in the aftermath of the Indo Sri Lanka accord in August 1987, stated, “We love India. We love the Indian people. There is no question of us taking up arms against Indian soldiers." He reiterated the LTTE’s friendly stance towards India, despite making the obvious observation that the accord was not going to benefit the Tamil people.
Whilst criticising the flawed Indo Sri Lanka accord, the LTTE leader clearly expressed his friendliness towards India and its people. It should be noted that Mr. Prabakaran articulated that the LTTE and the Sri Lankan Tamils will never be a danger to the interests and sovereignty of India and its people 17 years ago.
Mr. Prabakaran reiterated this stance in the media conference he held at Kilinochchi in April last year. It is worth pointing out that the Politico-Military strength enjoyed by the LTTE in 1987 is vastly different from that it experienced in 2002. Therefore, despite the improvement in its Politico-Military profile, the LTTE supremo has maintained a steadfast policy of friendliness towards India.
It is also noteworthy that the LTTE initially sought Indian facilitation for the direct talks with the Sri Lankan government. The LTTE’s Chief Negotiator, Mr. Anton Balasingham, tried to seek India’s facilitation through direct and indirect channels. However, it is unfortunate that the present Indian government failed to react positively to these signals from the LTTE.
However, LTTE continued with its expression of friendly relations towards India.
Mr.V.Balakumar, one of LTTE’s senior political leaders underscored these sentiments again in one of his recent speeches. Expressing confidence that India would soon come to know the true position of the LTTE, Mr.Balakumar said that, if India comes forward to improve its relationship with sincere heart, the LTTE would be pleased. “The LTTE will not engage in activities that could disrupt the regional politics of India,” he said, adding that the LTTE leadership is also very keen to mend fences with India. Mr.Balakumaran commented that India had been using the LTTE’s freedom struggle for its political interests, but said that the LTTE would not engage in any confrontation with India or work against its interests
The LTTE and the Tamil people have been both vocal and consistent in their sincere friendliness towards India right throughout history. However, has the Sinhala nation expressed the same gratitude towards India? Have the Sinhala political parties behaved in a consistent manner towards India? What does the average Sinhala citizen think about India?
It is worth noting that, in contrast to the friendly relationship Tamils had with India, the Sinhalese have always expressed enmity towards India. Even after gaining independence from Britain, the Sinhala nation continued with its anti Indian sentiments. Sri Lanka entertained Political, Military and Economical relations with many anti Indian countries such as Pakistan and China. During the cold war era, whilst India was in the USSR camp, Sri Lanka sided with the USA.
It is sad to note that the Sinhala nation harboured enmity towards India and its people right throughout. It is worth remembering that the Sri Lankan government declared a public holiday to celebrate its cricket team's first ever test cricket win over India.
What is the reason for the opposition to the Indo Sri Lanka accord in the South? Whatever the problem it may be there should not an Indian invention and anti Indian sentiment is the major driving force behind these upheavals.
The Sinhala nation, which was so vociferous in its opposition to the Indian intervention in the Eighties, has been recently inviting India to intervene in the ethnic crisis. This is not because of a change in heart from the Sinhala nation. It is because of their desire to break the strength of the Tamil liberation struggle at any cost.
It is in this background I would like to analyse India’s foreign policy towards Sri Lanka.
India is a multi cultural, multi lingual and multi religious country. Its government considers itself as a true representative of these various factions of the society, which is a prudent policy. Indian government should perceive its neighbours through the concept of “pluralistic society” in the same way it perceives its own nation. Unfortunately the Indian government seems only interested in the well being of the Sinhala nation as far as the Sri Lankan conflict is concerned. Therefore India’s foreign policy towards Sri Lanka is biased towards Sinhala hegemony. India’s foreign policy should not be partial towards one side of the conflict; it should be neutral towards both societies. This change needs to happen in India’s foreign policy towards Sri Lanka.
If one takes a deeper look at the Sri Lankan Tamils' struggle for independence, it will be evident that the Tamil liberation struggle has to a certain extent enabled India to preserve its superpower status in the South Asian region. It is worth noting that it is because of the effective control the LTTE exercises over the NorthEast of the Island, both in the sea and land, anti Indian forces have not been able to penetrate India’s corridor. If not for the presence of the LTTE, the Sri Lankan government would have sold out the Island to anti Indian forces long time ago. Sri Lanka would have entered into the same defence agreements it is talking about and entering into with anti Indian forces and foreign troops would have occupied India’s corridor by now.
India should open its eyes to these realities and think. !!!!
The LTTE has clearly articulated their policy towards India consistently over a long period. The Tamil nation has been yearning for friendly relations with India, then and now. It is understandable that a super-regional power like India will have many issues to be concerned about. However, it is an undisputable fact that the LTTE has been the force which has transformed the Tamil nation living in the Island of Sri Lanka into a nation to be reckoned with. In this context, the LTTE leadership has been addressing various concerns India may have publicly, in a very articulate manner.
What are these concerns, which are being addressed by the LTTE leadership?
Ø LTTE does not want to harm the regional superpower status enjoyed by India
Ø LTTE is not against India’s sovereignty, the Indian nation or the Indian people at large.
Ø LTTE will not be an obstacle to India’s national interests.
Ø LTTE does not act against the geopolitical interests of India.
Ø LTTE does not want to hinder the economic well-being of India
Ø LTTE does not intend to cause any trouble in India’s domestic political scene.
In contrast the LTTE and its leadership is seeking and is willing to
Ø Maintain cordial relations with India.
Ø Consider India as a friendly neighbour
Ø For a change in India’s foreign policy towards achieving a friendly and cordial relationship with India.
India should accept the reasonable and justifiable aspiration of the LTTE. India should take necessary steps towards achieving this relationship. If India needs further clarification in any of its concerns, it should not hesitate to open a communication channel with the LTTE. Therefore, India should approach the LTTE diplomatically. This is the request of both the Tamil people and the LTTE Leadership. Hope this wish will materialise in 2004.
P.S: kittu is a Sinhalaya pretending to be a Srilankan Tamil
Print "Think, India, Think"
The
- From: tigerboy (@ )
on: Thu Jan 29 06:03:08
Sorry Rg, but the Sinhala Army did kill more innocent civilians than LTTE...
Tell your friend about this topic
Want to post a response?
Back to the Forum