Understanding Manu

Topic started by Karthik (@ c998718-a.bvrtn1.or.home.com) on Thu Sep 21 15:42:46 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

Irukkaradhu oru naadu. Idhila dravidian brahmin indha sandai veraya. For all those manu bashing dravida munnetra ppl, the rule that manu put forth was, no one is born as a brahmin, vaishya, kshatriya or sutra. They are denoted as such by their actions. Indian society at that time was just like American society now. Did u know that in ancient times, if a guest desires then the woman of the house must given sexual pleasures. That was why Indian society was a matriarchical society. Examples Anjaneya is Anjani putra (son of Anjani (mother)).
Manu (whatever his position in society was at that time) got fedup with the wayward society and hence decided to bring his dharma. But in due course due to some selfish souls the caste thing became heriditary.
Manu was responsible for these four divisions. Can someone tell me how other divisions like naidu's reddy's raju's nadars etc came about ? I don't think manu created them. The dravida parties have taken Tamilians for a ride with North bashing and Anti Hindu agitation.
Call up one of those guys and ask him to pronounce Vazhaipazham ??? All those Ambedkarites, Dravidians etc etc who oppose Manu are totally oblivious of history. They think that by their emotional outbursts they can change history. Why do the govt. forms still have caste thing in them even after 25 yrs of Dravidian rule ? If they want to remove casteism why do they still have reservation.


Responses:


  Tell your friend about this topic

Want to post a response?

Post a response:

Name:

E-mail:


Please Reload to see your response


Back to the Forum