:roll: :roll: :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by pavalamani pragasam
Printable View
:roll: :roll: :roll:Quote:
Originally Posted by pavalamani pragasam
See even you couldn't help but type that statement. See you yourself couldnt support his decision without the fact that he went back for a better job.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
As for the HATSOFF, yes Hatsoff to have got out of the "egoless" state, studying well and getting a better job.
:rotfl: SANDEEP.
That statement is to say, by being patient and egoless and taking his wife's contribution and help equally cool, HE STOOD TO GAIN.
If one says, WHY SHOULD I SIT AND STUDY IN MY WIFE'S EARNING, who is the loser?
So was not he the ultimate winner?
Thats what that sentence meant :lol:
Sandeep: What is wrong in a man being a house husband... being a house husband doesn't mean that he is at home cleaning and cooking and doing nothing else, maybe he likes to paint or do something different which does not involve going to an office....
I see more and more women taking the responsibility of going into work while their husband gets to do something of his choice these days. It also helps to have a breadwinner when the husband is trying his hand at business or something of that sort, where the income is not as stable as a 9-5 job!
Why is it that a woman gets the choice of staying at home or working while a man has no choice but to work? I feel that men should be given a choice too :)
Aiyoooo, Aiyayaooo,
If you change the meaning of the word "house husband" then I have no choice.
There is this Tailor and a Music teacher near my house in native who work from home. Both their wives work in Post office (9-5).
I will not call the Tailor a "House Husband" because he works hard and earns his worth. But the Music Teacher is good for nothing except to disturb my saturday sleep. He doesnt earn anything (for obviuos reasons) and lives on his wives earnings. This is the guy I would have called "House Husband" had he atleast done some domestic work.
Ok. I know I always argue on unwanted things. I know MOST OF U dont agree with me.
But JUst in case, a man feels hapy cleaning cooking and doing jobs errands(complete taking care of home, plus jobs errands).... and wife earns.
I remember seeing an english serial with similar concept. (zee english or something)
Assuming that both of them are happy, Is there something wrong in that? Should it bother us or should we BELITTLE that man, or his wife, SAYING ITS OUT OF ORDINARY?
Agree with you SP, 100%.
Same way what is wrong in ME feeling ashamed for him ?
Why should u feel ashamed sandeep?
I agree its ur personal feelings on men staying at home. U are entitled to it.
But why form certain norms, rules and then say, ANYONE OR ANYTHING CROSSING THIS is funny or shame or weird?
yup I agree. ur feelings are purely urs. So therez nothing wrong in u feeling ashamed. ITs each one's personal view after all.
The question is, WHY HAVE PERSONAL VIEWS ON PERSONAL ISSUES OF OTHERS? Where does it pinch us?
Actually thiking in a very broader view, THEN NOTHING IS WRONG.
neither u feeling ashamed
nor he having his life that way
nor anyone doing anything
its all each one's life after all :)
Simple because we are all humans and so Social animals.Quote:
Originally Posted by SP
I am against forcing my own views on others. But things that happen around me generates views and once views are created they are shared.
Its not "thinking in a broader view" but it is "thinking in a detached view".Quote:
Originally Posted by SP
Again, becoz we are a social animal. We need each other, we have grown over the other species and wrath of nature by this interdependence. We are physically inequiped to survive in this world but its team work, society that has made us what we are today.Quote:
Originally Posted by SP
Everything is private but nothing is private
I agree with u.
Where exactly SOCIETY comes in here? Where do u think HIS way of living WOULD AFFECT THE society we live in?