Quote:
Schizophrenia, Psychotic, hallucinations, delusions, phantasm etc. are the technical terms to describe mental states of people who unwarily or helplessly detach themselves from reality and engage themselves in distortions of perceptions, thought, language and emotions along with false perceptions of an entity that doesn't exist.
This does not apply to a person like me, because I dont think of an entity that does not exist. I am talking about "me" the "being", but which is not the body and the mind. But this "being" is not generated by nervous impulses in the brain.
Now comming to your side, what is real?. Should I quote for you scientific papers that come to the conclusion that what we perceive through the senses are not real?
Quote:
Distortion of thinking process, such as violations of logic, incoherent statements and inappropriate shifts in expressions is common in their spoken and/or written communications. Through dissociative reactions, they continue to maintain their false beliefs despite of the clear evidence and proofs to the contrary.
How are you different from the people who believe what they see is real?. It took years in western world to comprehned the idea that the world is round and earth is revolving around the sun and not other way. Because they beleive the sense organ perception to be real. So you think what I say voliates logic because your core understanding is based on sensual perception only.
Quote:
Over the entire period of all our debates, you have continually demonstrated such behaviours along with impertinent gestures of spitting in people's mouths and comparing them with your four-year son when faced with unanswerable questions and arguments. I have reproduced clear evidences of all theses and they are still there in the relevant threads. Please go and read your own subterfuge behaviours along with your drifting and irreconcilable posts.
Comparing with my four year old son is not to belittle people. I use that to explain how our perception changes as our ability to have holistic view, instead of fragmented analysis.
Quote:
Looks like URU, URR, RRU, RRR are the main stumbling blocks in your way.
There is no stumbling. I am clear what i am talking and also understand what you are talking.
Quote:
Graspng the argument of physical phenomenon of sound waves (mantras) still remains a major challenge to you.
Again , the point is not about sound waves. My question is staright forward why did Buddha use vedic sounds, if he rejected Vedic knowledge. I have an explaination which you refuse to accept because of your pre-conceived notions.
I am quoting your own quote of dalai lama "No Nirvana without purification of the mind". [/quote]