Also by mentioning JS confessed prosecution might've expected that other people hiding might come out in public.
Only the J's(JS and Jaya) knows
Printable View
Also by mentioning JS confessed prosecution might've expected that other people hiding might come out in public.
Only the J's(JS and Jaya) knows
I tried analysing but you know I am dump guy. Not at all clever like you. So couldnt find the contradiction.Quote:
Originally Posted by geno
And you skiped again. I said <<So you hate Jayandra because he is anti-tamil. Fare enough.>> You very cleverly removed "Fare enough" :roll:
i have one mallu brahmin friend who is still close. Eventhough he sometimes opens his mouth to say about his caste, most ofthe time he feels what is the use of belonging to upper caste.
We dont have to amplify these stuff. Common people in india are not much into these issues except very few idiots. I guess india will goin the right directionif the political parties become less religious
>> You say Muslims, Christians and even antheist have right to interfere in Hindu religious matters but a Hindu from niebhouring state cannot. >>
Your "Hindu right-wing" anger is well-documented here! :lol:
Tell me sandeep :
1. Do you understand the historical "conglomerate" of the "Hindu" theologies?
2. Do you have even basic knowledge of Saivaism, Saktham, Vaishnavism, koumaram, Ganapathiyam and vaidheegam?
Can you tell me what these comprise of - and why these are relevant? :)
3. Can a Smarta brahmana interfere into A Saivaite or Vaishnavaite traditions?
4. Can anyone leave alone a smarta brahmana debase "thamizh" as "neesha" and "shudhra" language "unfit for using in temple poojas" - and that too living inside thamizhnadu??
5. Why have you not dealt with the exclusivist brahmanical tendencies of the "sankara mutt" inspite of the fact that - this thread Swami Agnivesh was about the pertinent q's that Agnivesh rasied?
6. Are you after all - a Namboodiri brahmin mallu - Masquerading as a "non-brahmin"?? :lol:
Online forum are for people who can comprehend Sandeep!
I have delved into the very core and the deepest issues concerning this issue!!
I have answered all your queries with completeness!!
But your poor lack of knowledge about - Idealogies and theologies have left you dumb and blind with incapacitate anger!
Look at you!! you are "angry" coz your "upper casteist" Blood cannot take the truth!
Try to "Read" what i have written before parroting the same thing all over again - making yourself a picture of fun! :lol:
I have long back agreed that I am dump. After all look at my avatar dont I look dumb. :lol:
I am what I am and dont intend to masquerade. But by asking about my caste are you not the one who is castist. I have never been interested in knowing anybodies caste.
You are madly castist.
geno wrote:
"There are sources which confirm - that she was indeed invited to the mutt by Jayendra ..........."
"It is also said that - after that incident & subsequent hospitalisation of anuradha ................"
"It seems that letter was only "shown" and not given to anuradha........ "
"Police may have traced this letter from that person......."
All your above postings are still a fiction. Phrases like "There are sources which confirm...", "It seems that the letter was only shown...","Police may have traced...."(While a letter existed or not itself is debatable police "may" have traced is still fictious) etc., only add more to the fiction. When you are trying to argue for / against something you need solid proof or reasonable arguments dude. "May", "Might", "seems" etc., will not work.
The public spat & sparring between Anurahda & that woman who took her to jayendra - on that fateful day when she was "molested" by jaendra - was witnessed by some people in the mutt itself.
They may be willing to talk! :)
Again an assumption. And it looks like even before the court's verdit you are pronouncing one here. I don't have any problem with people taking sides on issues. But I would appreciate if it's based on facts rather than fiction.
Bottomline is make reasonable assumptions. Your assumptions still may be right, but dosen't sound reasonable for me. So I will continue to remain confused till it's proven :lol: :lol:
Krishnan,
i merely reproduced media reports and assumptions based upon them.
You are right! In due legal procedure, Jayendra may still get acquitted from Sankarraman murder case.
But think of this:
not only the sankar raman case,
* attempt to murder case of Radhakrishnan
* attempt to murder case relating to archakar madhavan
* the new case of sexual assault by Anuradha Ramanan
* Swindling mutt funds (on the basis of Srirangam Usha's testimonials, and other evidences)
* Sexual mis-conduct in the mutt
* Old cases like the death of Subhashree of Kadaya nallur in one of Kanchi mutt's hostel, and death of 2 namboodiri brahmin boys from kerala which happened in 1985
There is a HUGE web of cases which have already been registered or - are on the anvil - against Jayendra :)
I believe - the JJ govt. intends to hold jayendra in a vice like grip for some time to come!
But personally - I still think [deleted] some damage control - and save atleast Jayendra from prison term (if at all he's awarded one at the end of a trial!)
Anyway - Jayendra's credibility as a sanyasin has already been destroyed.
IF Jayendra is REALLY not gulty of sexual mis-conduct - he should immediately slap a defamation suit against Anuradha Ramanan - (he should have done it already if he wasnt gulty! :P )
madiyila kaNam irunthAl thAnE vazhiyil bayam irukkum! :)
[deleted]
Please follow some decorum and have some respect for fellow-posters, if you want this thread to continue.
And guys, please dont generalise and bash groups of people or religion. We see this as nothing but provocation.
The deafening silence - of the "believers" - over the valid and pertinent observations of Swami Agnivesh makes me wonder!
Why is that absolutely none - even thought about acknowledging or grappling with his thoughts on this issue?
Sometimes silence says a lot more than million words.
you really are making headway in gettin this thread shut down aren't you indian_tamil