:ty: SPQuote:
Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
உண்ணப் பொசுப்பிருந்தால் உவைகையிலும் சம்பா கிடைக்கும்
Printable View
:ty: SPQuote:
Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
உண்ணப் பொசுப்பிருந்தால் உவைகையிலும் சம்பா கிடைக்கும்
ஏன் இவ்வளவு கோபம் ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
கடவுளை ஏன் மனிதனாக உருவகிக்கின்றோம்?
இவ் வுலகில் ஆகக் கூடிய சக்தி - மனிதனுக்குத் தான் உள்ளது
ஆகவெ நாம் மனிதனாக உருவகித்து - பல செயல்களைச் செய்வதால்
4 /6/12 கைகள் -
நிரம்பவே யோசிப்பதனால்
- பலதலைகள்
என உருவகித்துள்ளோம் .
deleted
Of course Buddhism talks about Karma. AFAIK it is the same as the Hindu concept, although the praarabhda, sancitha etc types may be different.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
There's nothing wrong with chance. As with the argument about the 'existence' of divinity, Karma cannot be proved or disproved, and neither can the probabilistic argument be proved/disproved (except of course in minuscule levels of Quantum theory).Quote:
2. Talking on karma, what if someone tries to get oversmart by convincingly thinking about CHANCE? IF xyz happens to undergo something its CHANCE / Probability theory. Why nature has to tally? Why do we assume, things are in perfection and hence WE NEED ACCOUNTABILITY in the form of 'KARMA' to finish the invisible picture?
'Why Karma? Why does this tallying take place?' I personally have no answer to this question. It is simply the nature of Life. You can ask the same of the laws of conservation of energy/momentum etc in physics. Why does nature behave in the way it does? I don't believe there is any sane answer to this question.
Karma includes the trident "thought, word and physical action". I like to think rather benignly of Praarabhda karma, as generating "new opportunities", based on ones past karma. Sometimes the opportunity might be of playing a lottery ticket winner, sometimes it might involve being the victim of an accident. But it is entirely up to oneself what one makes out of such opportunities.
Experiences are good or bad only subjectively, and often in the greatest curse lies the grandest blessing; and vice versa. That is so often the paradox of Life and it is upto oneself to put one's arm into the darkness and grab the Light out of it.
Ultimately a belief in Karma can only be used to broadly govern our social behaviour. For most intricate parts of Life, this good-bad-action-reaction ideology fails miserably, because of the fact that Life is simply far more grey-er than we assume it to be. Therefore it is upto oneself to realize his Swa-Dharma and act accordingly, be it a cold-blooded murderer or a most compassionate saint.
Love and Light.
நன்றாகச் சொன்னீர்கள் :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by aanaa
His son is missign for a fortnight or so, wont a dad be too eager to go and fetch him all by himself? I agree these are priorities. Fine so be it. It was unpleasant to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by aanaa
I'm happy.
Interestingly just a week ago I posted a Poll on my blog "Do you believe in Karma?". :D :D
Response: 36 votes in total.
Yes - 29
No - 4
No Idea - 3
I had but a hazy view about Karma. I do believe in it. If somebody asks me what Karma is, i would simply say that "Karma is the Deciding Factor". Yes it is.
Certain things cannot be proved. But can be felt, realized or experienced.
You be an atheist or theist - But believe in Karma. You get what you deserve.
I've few more to share about Karma. Will Share :D :D
anbu_kathir,
True.
Karma or chance was/is a vast topic of debate in itself. We have had such debates in our hub and the result pointed nowhere.
our action is our karma- we are responsible for karma - for continuity too
so we can control in forth coming lives if we do good now ...
aana,
My suggestion.
we can keep polls on th ese topics
(changing the poll topic every week)
agreed
go ahead SP
NeengaLe seyyngaLEn aana,
oru vaarathukku Indha serialil varum oru viLakathai eduthukondu, atharkku negating and agreeing response veikkalaam.
Even if 3 to 5 people vote, we can switch over to another topic , consecutive week.
As we say that Karma is nothing but our action. So the good things, hardships that we face in this birth are the result of the Karma of our last birth.
But, in some cases, whatever bad things that an X does are passed on to his children and his children suffer a lot. Whats your (anyone here, SP, Anbu sir, Aana) call on this?
VR,
I know one cult of thought where they share the idea, that,
....the soul with its vaasanas, desires and imprints, after it forgoes the body gets merged in the grand children or anyone with SIMILAR ideas and thoughts. That is why we find, the children or grandchildren fulfilling grand parent's wishes.
i.e. that is why they also say,
"avanga sagalai, unga (dash dash) vadivla nammaloda thaan irukaanga" etc.
i.e Jivatmas which bear similar nature, or has similar desires or vaasanas to a major extent, unites together to achieve their goal.
In many cases soul attaches itself to the grandchildren or its own progenies, very rare cases it unites with similar other souls of NO GENETIC connection.
i.e. to some xyz who has similar nature or thoguhts or desires.
___
Some others explain, that, when the child is formed in the womb, some of the imprints or cluster of our karmic desires of parents, pass on to the children (thus we suffer or benefit because of our forefathers)
___
That's a Great piece of information.... 1st time i'm hearing this akka. Thank you so much. :ty:
I'll quote one instance which may better explain what exactly I'm asking.
X gets married to a girl. He tortures her physically, mentally. He doesn't give her the peace. He (when she is alive) has contacts various other girls/ladies and starts a life with another girl leaving his first wife in hardship.
Now the son of X (born to first wife) gets married and just in a span of few years the son gets divorced. This son is very genuine in his char. But the girl he got married to is worst in char, not being sincere to him. Assume that X is still alive and leading a life with the 2nd wife.
So where exactly the "Karma" factor comes plays its trick in this instance? Why does the son suffer even though he hasn't done anything wrong?
vr,
regarding the cult of thought which says 'souls of which has same nature and goal, merge together'
I have no complete knowledge to pass some theory as yes or say no to some theory. I am still learning and contemplating. So, thats just an info I shared. I aint vouching it :|
Karma does not start with X, vr.Quote:
Originally Posted by viraajan
That would have been karmas of their families passed for thro genes for ages unknown.
So, the son is suffering because of some genetic connection, for which probably, HE is rightfully the sinner from ages unknown. It is believed every thought and action would have a reaction.
So, he (x's son) alone is responsible. Karmic imprints of this suffering must have been passed to him, who is the rightful bearer.
Akka, thanks for sharing it :) :)
You say you are still learning... But i'm saying that just now i've started learning :oops: So every piece of information is valuable to me :yes:
Viraajan,Quote:
As we say that Karma is nothing but our action. So the good things, hardships that we face in this birth are the result of the Karma of our last birth.
But, in some cases, whatever bad things that an X does are passed on to his children and his children suffer a lot. Whats your (anyone here, SP, Anbu sir, Aana) call on this?
_________________
That's a Great piece of information.... 1st time i'm hearing this akka. Thank you so much.
I'll quote one instance which may better explain what exactly I'm asking. X gets married to a girl. He tortures her physically, mentally. He doesn't give her the peace. He (when she is alive) has contacts various other girls/ladies and starts a life with another girl leaving his first wife in hardship.
Now the son of X (born to first wife) gets married and just in a span of few
years the son gets divorced. This son is very genuine in his char. But the girl he got married to is worst in char, not being sincere to him. Assume that X is still alive and leading a life with the 2nd wife.
So where exactly the "Karma" factor comes plays its trick in this instance? Why does the son suffer even though he hasn't done anything wrong?
_________________
The following is how I think of it and might have little bearing with what is traditionally accepted as how things work. I tend to use a lot of 'vocabulary' that makes up my reality about these issues, so please bear with me if you wish to go through this.
The Universe is a place of Free Choice. That was the whole point of Creation. The Creator need not have created (or equivalently have become the Creation) if He/She didn't wish to give Creation ( His/Her parts - the Jivaatmans - Individuations ) Free Will.
It would have been really stupid on the Creators part if He/She wished to create His own Individuations, and then put rules for them to be 'forced' to be attached to other Individuations.
I wholeheartedly believe there is absolutely nothing that is happening with us that we have not asked for (by thought, word or deed -- in other words, Karma) at some level. By this 'level', I mean the subconscious, the conscious, or the superconscious levels of awareness. One may indeed raise the issues - " Did the person who is being murdered by a killer ask for such a death to happen to him/her?" I believe the answer is yes, although it is not apparent to any of us why one may have 'chosen' such a death, I believe nothing is experienced by the Jivaatman which is not in its line of spiritual development.
So the answer to your question is simple. The Individuation (Jivaatman) that called itself Person X wished to experience being a torturer, a traitor to his wife, a womaniser. The Individuation that called itself " Wife of Person X" wished to experience being tortured, being betrayed. Similarly the Individuations that called itself as "Son of X" and the "wifes of X" wished to experience what they experienced. Because of the complementary desires of these Individuations, they decided to journey together in the physical realm as long as their desires are fulfilled satisfactorily, and then they pass along.
Again I would like to stress: when I mean "wished to experience", this does not necessarily happen at the level of conscious awareness, ie the conscious mind. It happens at a far more subtler level. The souls of these people themselves seek to address their own spiritual evolution in this manner. It is only the awakened person that is able to see the perfection of the system, the myriad beautiful ways in which Free Will plays itself out and also is able to actually consciously create His/Her own experience because to Him/Her there is absolutely no difference between Subconscious/Conscious/Superconscious states of Awareness (aka God and the Soul are One).
Although it sounds sadistic, it is in no way meant so. There is great pain in the process of evolution, as we know, Nature evolves itself through several several mistakes. So many species have sprung and fallen before Nature has become the beauty she is today, and all of them, however dangerous or fierce, were beautiful in the same way that the ones survived are beautiful today.
Love and Light
Thanks Anbu Kathir for your explanation.
I understand some of your points.
You've mentioned that X or his wife or his son wished to experience the hardships. So this happens in subconscious level. Am I right?
Now my question is,
When exactly the wish blossoms?
Will the person be in the same subconscious level till the end?
Not necessarily the subconscious level. The subconscious is that part of the mind which is necessary for 'spontaneous' reactions that the conscious mind doesn't have to be bothered about... like you touch a hot plate, immediately your hand pulls back... that doesn't have to be a consciously made decision, it is something the body has learnt and absorbed into its nature as a result of prior experience (over millions of years).Quote:
Originally Posted by viraajan
The mind too, has so many subconscious reactions as a result of the evolution of the human psyche. All these are subconscious imprints, and although we experience their effects in the physical world, we are unaware of why we react in that way or what caused such a reaction.
The desire of having an experience of living with hardships, or the desire of living any particular kind of experience in a life, are often made at the superconscious levels. By the superconscious I mean that level of awareness where there is a understanding of the 'big picture', like getting a birds eye view of the cosmic interconnections between ourselves and the souls of the universe, the lifetimes that we have lived on the physical plane and elsewhere.
From this state of awareness, one could deliberately make a decision which might be one of shocking and unimaginable pain in one's own physical manifestation. Like the fact that one understands the need to take bitter medicine in order to get cured of a physical ailment, just so, at that level of awareness, it is a perfectly sane decision.
When does such a decision get made? First of all, time is not linear. So it is often better to accept 'states of Awareness' as the reference point, not time. For example, a normal human being who lives in and out of the three states of existence - Sleep, Waking, Dreams, in general makes many such "Life decisions" before he/she comes into the physical existence because that is where he/she would be in the superconscious state.
But a spiritually awakened human being, who has transcended his/her attachment with the world, can by his/her own accord move to a superconscious state inspite of being in waking/dream/sleep states and make his/her Life decisions there.
Can such a decision be overwritten when living the Life or would one have to live with the pain till the end? Yes surely, but for that one needs to be spiritually developed. It is very possible to shift the states of Awareness while being in the physical body by performing actions with certain intent - also called Tapas or Penance or Yoga or Communion. This might be through Bhakti, Jnaana, Karma .. the systems of Yoga most well documented in Hindu philosophy. Any other system will probably fall into one of these categories.
Love and Light.
Thank you so much Anbu Kathir for the explanation. But, I couldn't understand some parts of it :oops:
I'll ask few more such questions :)
thank you folks shedding more lights here
:clap:
why no one here ....
ah I am yet to write yesterday's episode :oops:
thanks
I do like ur avatar
March 2nd
________
கிருபாவின் அத்தை வீட்டில் தென்படாத அஷோக், சாலை நடுவில் மயங்கிய நிலையில் திருவண்ணாமலை அருகிலேயே நீலகண்டனுக்குக் கிடைக்கிறான். பெற்றோரும், நீலகண்டனும் அவன் போக்கில் தங்களுக்குள்ள மனவருத்தத்தை தெரிவிக்கின்றனர்.
அவர்களுள் நடந்த அழகிய சம்பாஷணையின் தோராயமான தொகுப்பு இதோ:
"எங்களை விட்டு விட்டு எங்கேடா போன?"
"எங்கே போவது? எங்கே போக முடியும்? எல்லாமே ஒரே இடத்துல லயிச்சு இருக்கும் போது, எது, அல்லது யார் எங்கே தான் போய்விட முடியும். ரமணரும் இதைத் தான் சொல்றார். எல்லாமும் எல்லா இடத்திலையும் இருக்கும் போது, எதுவும் எங்கேயும் போக முடியாது. ஐன்ஸ்டீன் கூட இதைத்தான் கண்டுபுடிச்சார்"
"இப்படி இருக்கியே, நாலு பேரை மாதிரி படிச்சு, பெரிய ஆள வரவேண்டாமா, நீயே ஒரு scientist, doctor-a ஆகலாமேடா"
"அவாள்ளாம் (அவர்கள் எல்லாம்) தனக்கு வெளிய ஆராய்ச்சி நடத்தினாளேயொழிய தனக்குள்ள இருக்கிற முழுமையை தேட நேரமில்லாம ஓய்ஞ்சு போயிட்டா. நான் அந்த முழுமையை ஆராய்ச்சி பண்றேன். அது தான் பூர்ணம். ultimate goal. Jesus என்ன டாக்டருக்கா படிச்சார்? ஆனால், அவர் எத்தனைப் பேரை குணமாக்கினார்? சித்தர்களுக்கு இருக்கிற ஆத்மஷக்தியால தங்களை தாங்களே உயர்த்திண்டா. அதை இன்னும் உசந்ததில்லையா"
"நாதன் இவனை பேசாம எதானும் சைக்கியாட்ரிஸ்ட் கிட்ட அழைச்சுண்டு போறது better."
"neurosis ன்னு சொல்லி, இரண்டு மருந்து எழுதி தருவா, சொல்ல போனா எல்லாருமே schezophreniaல பாதிக்கப்பட்டவா தான். ஒவ்வொருத்தருக்கு ஒவ்வொரு விதமான level. ஒரளவு எல்லாரும் ஒரே லெவல்ல இருந்த அது நார்மல், அது வேற வகையில இருந்த அதை அப்நார்மல் ன்னு சொல்லி தனியா பார்க்கறோம்"
இதையெல்லாம் கெட்டு அவன் பெற்றோர் மேலும் கலவரப்படுகின்றனர். நீலகண்டன் நடந்ததை தம் மனைவி பர்வதத்திடம் கூறுகிறார். அவளோ, அஷோக்கிற்கு ஜாதக தோஷத்திற்கு பரிஹாரம் செய்தால் குணமாகலாம் என்கிறார். இவ்விடத்தில் சோ, மருத்துவரிடம் அண்டும் போது எவ்வாறு சில மருந்துகள், மருத்துவர்கள் நமக்கு சரிப்படாமற் போய்விடுகிறதோ, தவறான மருந்து கொடுத்துவிடுகின்றனரோ, அதே போல் ஜோசியம் இன்றைய காலகட்டத்தில் வியாபாரமயமாக்கபட்டுவிட்டதால், சில நேரங்களில் (நம் கிரக நிலைகள் சரியாக அமையாத போது) நாம் காணும் ஜோசியம் பலிப்பதில்லை. அதனால் சரியானபடி ஜாதகம் கணிக்கப்படாமல், பரிகாரமும் தவறாய் அமைகிறது. நேரம் நன்றாக இருப்பின், சரியானதொரு பரிஹாரம் கிடைத்து, வாக்கு பலிதம் ஏற்படும் ஜோசியரும், துல்லியமான ஜாதக கணிப்பும், நமக்கு கைகூடும் என்பது தன் நம்பிக்கை என்று முடித்தார்.
:ty:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
சோதிடத்தில் நம்பிக்கை உண்டா?
is jodhidam science ???? :roll:
If u are asking me, then, yes, may be DEPENDS.Quote:
Originally Posted by aanaa
I believe a knowledgeable astrologer can very much predict one's past. Future predictions may and would vary depending on the mental will and drive of each person.
I would be based on what I am today. What I am today is in MY HANDS to a large extent. We can change the future, if not to a great extent, atleast to minute extent. (again it depends on how strong a person is wilfully or how strong is his aura )
In my opinion, it is. Planets and its positions are minutely calculated and the effects are studied based on innumerable experience and knowledge. Its a combination of astronomical science, mathematical science, planetorial positions and variations in its path, along iwth divine knowledge.Quote:
Originally Posted by bingleguy
http://www.akgupta.com/Thoughts/astrology.htm
I have already read this novel / story (sariya solla theriyalai)"enge Bramanan" . I think it was written sometime in the 1950's / 60's .. right?
Dnt know when it was written. but yes it was first released as a book.
But worth reading. My mom has read it. I'm trying to get hold of a copy :)
sometime after that i think, not sure when.Quote:
Originally Posted by HonestRaj
yes it was read widely as a novel .
As Cho clearly says, Astrology is TRUE. But astrologers??? hmmm :|
March 3rd
________
சன்யாசம் பற்றியும் காவியுடையின் மகத்துவம் பற்றியும் புத்தகம் ஒன்றை படித்துக்கொண்டிருக்கிறான் அஷோக். அதை பிடுங்கி எறிகிறாள் வசுமதி.
"நம்மைப் பிடித்திருக்கிற மாயைக் கூட இப்படி விட்டெறிய வேண்டும்" என்கிறான்.
தான் சன்யாசம் மேற்கொண்டால், அவள் சம்மதிப்பாளா என்று கேட்கிறான். வசுமதி காட்டமாக பதில் பேசுகிறாள். நீ சன்யாசம் வாங்கிக்கொண்டு போவாயானால் போய்க்கொள் எனக்கு யாதொரு கவலையும் இல்லை என்று அழுகையும் ஆதங்கமும் கொப்பளிக்க கோபமாக பேசுகிறாள். எனக்கு ஏன் இப்படி ஒரு பிள்ளையை கொடுத்தாய் என்று இறைவனிடம் அழுகிறாள்.
"நாடகம் ஒன்று தான், பாத்திரங்கள் தான் மாறும், உனக்கு எப்படி உன் மகன் உன்னைப் புரிந்து கொண்டு உன்னுடன் இருக்கவேண்டும் என்று எதிர்பார்க்கிறாயோ, அதே போல் அண்ட சராசரத்தை படைத்த எல்லோருக்கும் மாதாவான உலக அன்னை, நான் அவளடி இருக்க வேண்டும் என்று நினைக்க மாட்டாளா" என்கிறான்
சன்யாசத்தைப் பற்றி பேசும் போது, சோ இவ்வாறு கூறுகிறார். சன்யாசத்தில் நான்கு வகை உண்டாம். க்ரம சன்யாசம், ஆதுர சன்யாசம், அதி ஆதுர சன்யாசம், ஆபத் சன்யாசம் என்பன.
(இதைப் பற்றி சோ விளக்கவில்லை) க்ரமம் என்றால் நியதி rule. அஃதாவது படிப்படியாய் சன்யாசம் பெறுவது. முறைப்படி சன்யாசம் பெறுவது. க்ருஹஸ்தாஸ்ரம் தொடங்கி, வானப்ரஸ்தம் தொடர்ந்து, 60 வயதிற்கு மேல் பக்குவம் அடைந்த சிலர் க்ரம சன்யாசம் மேற்கொள்ளலாம். அல்லது முறையாய் குருவின் ஆசியோடு சன்யாசம் வாங்கிக்கொள்ளலாம். இது தான் க்ரம சன்யாசம் என்று நினைக்கிறேன். அதிஆதுர சன்யாசம் மற்றும் ஆதுர சன்யாசம் பற்றி தெரியவில்லை. ஆதுரம் என்றால் படிப்படியாக என்று பொருட்படலாம். சரியாய் தெரியவில்லை.
பெற்றோரின் ஒப்புதல் இன்றி சன்யாசம் மேற்கொள்ளக்கூடாது. இதற்காகவே ஷங்கராச்சார்யார், முதலையின் பிடியில் இருக்கும் போது, 'சன்யாசம் என்பது மறு பிறவி, இந்த முதலைக்கு என்னை இப்பிறவியில் தீண்டும் கர்மா உள்ளது, நான் சன்யாசம் மேற்கொண்டால் எனக்கு இன்னொரு பிறவி, ஆகவே முதலை என்னை விட்டுவிடும், எனக்கு ஒப்புதல் அளி' என்று தாயாரை வேண்டுகிறார். அதன் படி தாயார் சம்மதத்தின் பேரில் அவர் உடனே 'ஆபத்-சன்யாசம்' மேற்கொண்டாராம். சன்யாசம் மேற்கொள்ளும் போது ப்ரிஷை மந்திரம் என்று ஒன்று சொல்லவேண்டுமாம். அதன் அர்த்தம் "நான் ஒருவருக்கும் தீமை/தீங்கு இழைக்க மாட்டேன்" என்பது. மாத்வாச்சாரியார் சன்யாசம் பெற அவர் பெற்றோர் மறுத்தனர். அவரை போகமல் இருக்க வேண்டி அவர் தந்தை அவரை வலம் வந்து நமஸ்கரித்தார். உடனே மாத்வாச்சார்யார் சிரித்து "பிள்ளையைத் தந்தை வணங்கி என்னை சன்யாசி ஆக்கிவிட்டீர்கள்" என்றாராம். சன்யாசியை பெரியவர் சிறியவர் என எல்லோரும் வணங்கவேண்டும். பெற்ற தந்தையும் வணங்கவேண்டும். ஆனால் அவரின் தாயை மட்டும்
சன்யாசி விழுந்து வணங்கலாம்.
ஆங்! கதை என்னவாயிற்று என்று தெரியணுமா? பெரிசா ஒண்ணும் இல்லை. புதியதாக வேம்பு என்ற ஒரு புரோகிதர் அவர் குடும்பம் என பாத்திரங்கள் புகுத்தப்பட்டிருக்கிறது. அவர்களுக்கு ஜெயந்தி என்ற ஒரு பெண், அவளுடைய திருமணப்பேச்சு நடக்கும் போது, க்ருபாவிற்கு அவளை திருமணம் செய்ய வெம்பு ப்ரியப்பட ஆனால் அவர் மனைவிக்கு அதில் இஷ்டம் இல்லை. ஜெயந்தி தனக்கு க்ருபாவை மணந்து கொள்வதில் இஷ்டம் எனச் சொல்லிச் செல்கிறாள். ஆக, நம் கதையும் முக்கோணக் காதலில் சிக்கியாகிவிட்டது.
(வளரும்)
எல்லாமே நடந்து முடிந்தது என்றால் -Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
ஏன் எதிர்காலத்தை துண்ணியமாகக் கணிக்க முடிவதில்லை
சன்யாசி மட்டுமல்ல மனிதப் பிறவிகள் யாவருமே இப்படி ஒரு சங்கல்ப்பம் எடுக்கணும்Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakthiprabha
Aanaa,Quote:
Originally Posted by aanaa
I believe the Universe is a place of infinite possibilities. If you study the quantum theory of physics, you will get to know that in any given situation, an infinite number of possible future situations exist, each of which has a certain probability of happening depending upon the previous events (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrodingers_cat). The same thing is true about our future.
" Ellaame nadandhu mudindhadu " means "All possibilities exist and have happened/can happen when a certain sequence of previous events occur." That sequence (of previous events) is primarily determined by the actions of the individual. Just as in quantum physics there are an infinite number of variables to be taken into account whenever one has to study the behavior of any particular particle in a many-body system (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-body_theory) , in the same way, the future of an individual involves so many variables, the most important of which is his/her own efforts. Quantum physics therefore is a good analogy, however I do not think one can proclaim for astrology to be a science in the normal convention of the word, as Quantum physics is. I think that would be a bit preposterous.
Predicting the future means picking one of those infinite possibilities of the future. Therefore it is impossible to predict the actual sequence of events exactly (picking one with 100% guarantee would mean that the Universe is in fact not a field of infinite possibilities and there is therefore no meaning for human effort). Thus the astrologer, however good he/she might be, can only indicate those events which have a high probability of happening. Again there is a small albeit finite probability that it might also not happen, because of the fact that one cannot track all the infinite variables involved (again, the most important of which is human effort). I believe this is what is meant by "vidiyai madiyaal vendru vidalaam".
Love and Light.
That's a good point actually :DQuote:
Originally Posted by anbu_kathir
I would like to share what I've heard.
According to the calculation of no of planets, in Planet Astrology, the max no of probabilities that can exist is 108.
I'm not sure how true it is... :|