Anoushka
28th April 2006, 12:48 PM
Last night I was watching this program on Tele about clinical trials being conducted in India. I have nothing against clinical trials. I would sign up as a volunteer for one if I know that it would be useful for at least a group of people in the future and if I am clearly explained what the whole thing is about and what I could expect to get out of it - both negative and positive.
They showed a few different cases.
1. A drug that wasn't ready for testing on humans in US got tested in India. The Doctor from John Hopkins in US got banned from taking part in any clinical trials in her life when they found out. But she is considered a humanitarian in US. How can someone like her do something like this? Is the value of life in India any different? This is neither legally correct nor morally correct - at least according to me!
2. Most patients were not informed that they were a part of clinical trials.
3. Some people were taken off their current medication for a period of time before starting the clinical trial. Reason being they wanted to flush the body of the effects of current medication before doing their tests with their new medicine. In some cases they were given placebos as a part of their test. People were misinformed about their current medication - as in, some of them were told that their medicine has been taken off the shelf so they have to use a new medicine which comes for free.
4. After the trial period, the patients were taken off their new medication and started back again on their original medication.
5. None of them got paid anything extra to undergo clinical trials.
They actually interviewed doctors, patients from different parts of the country (Kerala, Ahemdabad, Bombay) and also a doctor who actually let this info out and got thrown out of his job.
One of the doctors that was interviewed echoed my opinion and he also said, whatever we say, there will be at least 2.5 million people on clinical trials in India in the next few years easily!
I found it worrying that patients and their near and dear were not informed clearly (they were made to sign on consent forms without being explained what it was for). Most of them were either too poor (so free medicines would help) or too ignorant, or thought that their doctor was God and whatever they said would be right!
Do you think this is right? What can be done to change this so that people can make an informed decision on what treatment they could get?
They showed a few different cases.
1. A drug that wasn't ready for testing on humans in US got tested in India. The Doctor from John Hopkins in US got banned from taking part in any clinical trials in her life when they found out. But she is considered a humanitarian in US. How can someone like her do something like this? Is the value of life in India any different? This is neither legally correct nor morally correct - at least according to me!
2. Most patients were not informed that they were a part of clinical trials.
3. Some people were taken off their current medication for a period of time before starting the clinical trial. Reason being they wanted to flush the body of the effects of current medication before doing their tests with their new medicine. In some cases they were given placebos as a part of their test. People were misinformed about their current medication - as in, some of them were told that their medicine has been taken off the shelf so they have to use a new medicine which comes for free.
4. After the trial period, the patients were taken off their new medication and started back again on their original medication.
5. None of them got paid anything extra to undergo clinical trials.
They actually interviewed doctors, patients from different parts of the country (Kerala, Ahemdabad, Bombay) and also a doctor who actually let this info out and got thrown out of his job.
One of the doctors that was interviewed echoed my opinion and he also said, whatever we say, there will be at least 2.5 million people on clinical trials in India in the next few years easily!
I found it worrying that patients and their near and dear were not informed clearly (they were made to sign on consent forms without being explained what it was for). Most of them were either too poor (so free medicines would help) or too ignorant, or thought that their doctor was God and whatever they said would be right!
Do you think this is right? What can be done to change this so that people can make an informed decision on what treatment they could get?