Topic started by tamacha (@ 62.105.98.245) on Tue Jan 6 08:53:49 EST 2004.
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

Michael Cremo and Forbidden Archeology Etc.

From its initial release in 1993 to the present, Forbidden Archeology has shocked and delighted readers around the globe with a veritable encyclopedia of anomalous scientific evidence challenging the standard views on human evolution. NEW!
Join us in this fascinating intellectual excavation of a vast store of hidden knowledge and meet author Michael Cremo, who has planted a time bomb in the archives of conventional history.
All material copyright 1996-2003 Unlimited Resources/BBT Science Books

Explore the Museum of Forbidden Archeology NBC's Mysterious Origins of Man Michael Cremo's Travel Diary Introducing Michael Cremo
Lectures
News Releases
Interviews
EVENTS About Forbidden Archeology Other Pubs & Order Info Contact Us & Links to Anomalous Sites



Go to Human Devolution website: http://www.humandevolution.com
Go to Forbidden Archeology website: http://www.forbiddenarcheology.com

this is the site and books with various photos and hard scientific evidence to prove that mankind has been in existence for millions of years.

Mr Idiot-I-Am

Eat your chudis.

Nobody in the real world is interested in Imperialistic Nazi out-dated texts or theories.

INNIT

Fingerklick

Responses:

• From: Idiappam (@ cache138.156ce.maxonline.com.sg) on: Tue Jan 6 12:23:06 EST 2004
  
  Two links to sites selling books? That too, written by White men???
  
  200,000 copies sold???
  
  Well! anything that can nurse a bruised ego sells well! Don't they?
  
  
• From: tamacha (@ 62.105.98.245) on: Wed Jan 7 10:22:48 EST 2004
  
  my name is IDIOT-I-AM and don't have a dunda and that is why i bark bcos even the street dogs won't touch me.......
  
  What difference does it make whether it has been written by a black man, white man, or an Indian?
  
  If there are skulls that date back to 500 million years old along with spears and basic tools what difference does it make whether they are discovered by a white or coloured guy?
  
  The fact of the matter is they HAVE been found and confirmed........
  
  Thank you for more backward entertainment by yourself to the western world, at firs people did believe that the South was more civilised but this site has shown quite the opposite, you personally are behaving like a RAKSHASH.
  
  No offence to those who have displayed civilised mannerisms, but you are an Idiot, just ike your name has confirmed MR IDIOT-I-AM.
  
  Please keep providing me and my fellow students (who are white and also know of the full demise of the AIT) the entertainment you have, your parents and your country must be proud of you.
  
  Thank you once again.
  
  
• From: suresh (@ 61.247.244.126) on: Mon Jan 12 15:49:46 EST 2004
  
  Well said Tamacha
  
  
• From: k. (@ 62.105.98.245) on: Tue Jan 13 09:24:22 EST 2004
  
  no, thank you Suresh.
  
  at least another indian who will speak truth.
  
  jai hind for positivity
  
  
• From: gffhfgh (@ 218.5.254.129) on: Mon Jan 26 14:20:14 EST 2004
  
  http://www.datanumeric.com/dravidian/page01.html
  
  Learn how sanskrit,greek and all european languages derive from dravidian roots. All indians are dravidians. India is dravid vartha.
  INDIA is DRAVIDVARTHA.
  INDIA is DRAVIDVARTHA.
  INDIA is DRAVIDVARTHA.
  INDIA is DRAVIDVARTHA.
  
  
• From: drurtyrtytr (@ 218.5.254.129) on: Mon Jan 26 14:26:32 EST 2004
  
  
  correct link
  
  http://www.datanumeric.com/dravidian/page001.html
  
  
• From: curious tamacha (@ 62.105.98.245) on: Wed Feb 4 11:24:31 EST 2004
  
  Arya means noble
  
  what does Dravid mean?
  
  
• From: tamacha (@ 62.105.98.245) on: Mon Feb 16 11:02:48 EST 2004
  
  who said india is DRAVID - VARTHA?
  
  hitler?
  
  indias name is ARYA - VARTHA
  
  always has been always will be..........
  
  
• From: tamacha (@ 62.105.98.245) on: Mon Feb 16 11:06:19 EST 2004
  
  ########### SIGNS OF DESPERATION ###############
  
  Learn how sanskrit,greek and all european languages derive from dravidian roots. All indians are dravidians. India is dravid vartha.
  INDIA is DRAVIDVARTHA.
  INDIA is DRAVIDVARTHA.
  INDIA is DRAVIDVARTHA.
  INDIA is DRAVIDVARTHA.
  
  Look at the DESPERATION of this deluded fool.....
  
  Learn how sanskrit,greek and all european languages derive from dravidian roots. All indians are dravidians. India is dravid vartha.
  
  if SANSKRIT is derived from DRAVIDIAN how come there are 70 words for water in SANSKRIT and 65 words for EARTH.....NONE of them being derived from another language.........!!!!!!!
  
  these 70 words for water then amalgamate into 280 words with the addition of a prefix.....
  
  please can you say the same about DRAVIDIAN or TAMIL.........?
  
  if not then shut up and grow up and stop spreading mendacious lies that cannot be proven...
  
  k.
  
  
• From: Check your blood, your genes say you're from Africa (@ rdu57-22-030.nc.rr.com) on: Mon Feb 23 21:22:31 EST 2004
  
  Damn this Hindu Arryan crap. Check your blood, science says you are african.
  
  
  http://www.nationalgeographic.co.in/press_jom.asp
  
  
• From: mmr (@ 62.105.98.245) on: Tue Feb 24 07:47:53 EST 2004
  
  check your facts there was never an ARYAN invasion into India you NAZI follower.....
  
  
• From: maitreya (@ 62.105.98.245) on: Wed Feb 25 10:35:47 EST 2004
  
  whats wrong american african?
  
  africans are kushites
  
  the descendents of luv and kush - even the books of africa speak of the RAMAYAN........
  
  11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
  
  OM chanted through a tonograph produces the SRI YANTRA..........
  
  22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222
  
  Scrambling their networks...........
  
  33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333
  
  unscrambling your heads...........
  
  44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
  
  the seven chakras alligned together give the same pattern as the spark that ignites life into a computer......................
  
  55555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555
  
  to view the seven chakras a person has to be lying down.................
  
  66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666
  
  information overload..........
  data input procedure overheating...........
  
  77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777
  
  there was no ARYAN invasion................
  
  long live ARYA-VARTHA
  ARYA-VARTHA rocks!!!!!!!!!
  
  
• From: k (@ ) on: Fri Mar 19 11:20:40
  
  om chanted through tonoscope produces Sri Yantra!!!
  
  the seven chakras alligned together give the same pattern as the spark that ignites life into a computer......................
  
  see articles on OM through tonoscope listed below.....
  
  http://www.hyattcarter.com/path_of_sound.htm
  
  http://www.isibrno.cz/~gott/mandalas.htm
  
  http://home.mweb.co.za/sa/samten/jenny.htm
  
  now do you guys understand why the NAZIS and the west want to keep Aryanism downtrodden and hidden away as theirs?
  
  it is the coolest and most laid back religion, and way of life there is available amalgamating as many realms as possible as one............
  
  and you can understand why the
  
  and this is why they wish to down trod on the mother of all religions and ways of life....
  
  check facts out for yourself
  
  http://www.stephen-knapp.com/recent_archeological_finds_confirming_Vedic_history.htm
  
  
  
• From: Aki;la (@ cs6820424-80.austin.rr.com) on: Wed Apr 7 18:13:50 EDT 2004
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Fewer people speak Sanskrit in India than Hebrew, Arabic or even Italian ! Sanskrit is a dead language, and was so throughout Indian history. Indeed, it is a mongrel language, having arisen in the Devadasi mandirs as an illegitimate hybrid tongue of the enslaved Black Sudran women and the White Brahmin masters who raped them. Thus, more than 30 % of Sanskrit vocabulary and several features of Sanskrit grammar (eg. the -am ending, the cerebrals and the palatals) are of Dravidian origin. This tongue was subsequently used as liturgical language by the Brahmins in order to standardise Vedic scriptures.
  
  Sanskrit is Dead
  Sanskrit is to all intents and purposes, a dead language. The Brahmans are in the habit of glorifying the era of Anglo-Brahman colonialism; yet even during this `golden age' of Sanskritology when the likes of Max Mueller helped propagate the study of Sanskrit throughout the world, a mere handful of people spoke it.
  As per the 1951 Census, out of a total population of 362 million Indians, only 555 spoke Sanskrit ! Even languages like Italian and Hebrew, spoken by a handful of travellers, are more widely spoken than `Mother Sanskrit' ! The following table shows the abyssally low number of people speaking that mongrel tongue -
  
  
  Language No. of Speakers
  Sanskrit 555
  
  Portuguese 6652
  
  Arabic 7914
  
  French 1929
  
  Italian 685
  
  Hebrew 1209
  
  German 1665
  
  English 171742
  
  
  Number of Speakers as per 1951 Census ( Chat.73-74 )
  
  The 1921 Census of India reveals that a whole 356 people spoke the language in the entire Indian subcontinent ! Several obcure languages like Nicobarese and Khasi had many more speakers than `Mother Sanskrit' :
  
  
  Language No. of Speakers Reference
  Sanskrit 356
  Grierson, I, p.400
  Andamanese 580
  Grierson, I, p.390
  Nicobarese 8662
  Grierson, I, p.390
  Khasi 204103
  Grierson, I, p.390
  Bhotia 231885
  Grierson, I, p.391
  Naga 338634
  Grierson, I, p.394
  
  Number of Speakers as per 1921 Census
  
  During the same 1921 Census, the number of speakers of Indo-Aryan Languages was 229.561 million. Yet one hears the Brahmanist calls for the establishment of Sanskrit as the national language of the country, and indeed there are mad Brahmin proposals that all current languages in India be eradicated to make way for Sanskrit ! Even languages like Andamanese and Bhotia have a greater number of speakers than Sanskrit. They have more claim to being a national language than Dead Sanskrit. Yet no bigoted Brahmins claims to make Tamil, Arabic or Persian, each more widely spoken than Sanskrit, a national language !
  
  Sanskrit Was Always Dead
  The Brahmins have invented a ludicrous theory, as per which all languages in the world are derived from Sanskrit. Plain facts however, show that the Aryan savages on their barbaric invasion of India were much too uncivilized to have any writing, and spoke a group of tribal tongues now referred to as Old Indo-Aryan languages. The Vedas were composed in these languages, which are referred to as the Rig-Vedic, Sama-Vedic, Atharva-Vedic and Yajur-Vedic languages. The word Sanskrit does not occur in the Vedas, and hence the Vedas cannot be in Sanskrit. Moreover, the invention of Sanskrit is a very late occurrence, the word `Sanskrit' occuring for the first time in a manuscript of the Ramayana dating to the centuries AD ! The Enccyclopedia Britannica states :
  
  "In the latter [Ramayana] the term `samskrta' "formal, polished", is encountered, probably for the first time with reference to the language" -- [ EB 22 `Langs' 616 ]
  Thus, Classical Sanskrit is exactly analogous to the Old Church Slavonic language [ EB 22.696 ], which was created in 863 AD by Orthodox Slavs to counteract the effect of the Latin Catholic Church. It was a synthesis of West Slavic languages and Byzantine Greek. This process occurred in the Moravian kingdom, which united West Slavs in the 9th century AD. Thus, both Sanskrit and Old Church Slavonic evolved as syntheses of various languages and both arose as standard liturgical languages to counter heterodoxies.
  Similarly, the Brahmins of India realised that the Vedic and Vaishnava scriptures were in a variety of Old Indo-Aryan languages with the rise of the grave threats Jainism and Buddhism, both of which had a single standard theological language (Ardhamagadhi and Magadhi, respectively). In order to counter the threat posed by these stauch anti-Vedic religions, the Brahmins found it necessary to emulate their rivals and standardise the Vaishnava scriptures. The Brahmins chose Sanskrit, a language that has arisen in the brothel-temples as a hybrid tongue between the Adivasi Devadasis and the Aryan Brahmins who raped them.
  
  There is however, a more sinister motive in the creation of Sanskrit The Brahmins have always sought means to deprive the `Dasoo mobs' of non-Brahmins of the ability to learn. Brahmin absolute power was entrenched due to the sheer force of knowledge, and was firmly grounded in the principle of preventing other races to learn anything at all. By inventing such a complicated language, the Brahmins accomplished just that. The non-Brahmins were unable to learn anything on account of the complexity of Sanskrit, and hence the Brahmins succeeded in maintaining them at the level of stupefied idiots. Serious science becomes obscured when translated into Sanskrit hyperbole, and thus suited the Brahmin strategy of hiding knowledge.
  
  Even during Panini's era in the purest Brahmavarta region of Aryavarta, Sanskrit was not a spoken language. Panini himself refers to his language as `chandas' [ EB 22.616 ] and the commonly spoken tongues as `bhasas'. In fact, Panini did not use the word `Sanskrit' at all, yet the Brahmin liars claim him to have been the inventor of Sanskrit ! Instead, the word `Sanskrit' occurs for the first time in a late version of the Ramayana. Thus Sanskrit was only a liturgical language which arose in the huge brothel-temples as a hybrid language of the Aboriginal devadasis and the Aryan Brahmins. Subsequently, the Brahmins used this language for scriptural purposes and was, even when created in ca.500 BC, not spoken at all outside these brothel regions.
  
  The earliest inscriptions in India are those of the Mauryan Asoka (c.273 BC - 232 BC ), and number over 30. They are mostly in the Brahmi script, 2 are in Kharoshtri. They are in various Prakrits and some in Afghanistan are in Greek and Aramaic [ Bas 390-1 ]. Thus, even during the reign of King Ashoka the official language was Magadhi Prakrit. No Sanskrit ! The main reason that there are no early Sanskrit inscriptions is because Vedic-Vaishnava law forbade the use of `non-Ayran' writing to `pollute' Sanskrit. Even today one hears Pandits urging their pupils not to pollute Sanskrit by writing it down, and to avoid the `manual labour' of writing. The fanatic Pandit race of India is the most backward on record. Thus, due to the prevalence of Sanskrit, all literacy in India vanished and learning disappeared during the 2000 years of the Brahmanic Dark Ages..
  
  
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  
  References
  { Grierson } - Sir G. A.Grierson, `Linguistic Survey of India' . 1st ed. 1927, reprint Motilal Banarsiadass, Delhi 1967.
  
  { Chat } - S.K.Chatterji, ` Linguistic Survey of India: Languages and Scripts' , in Cultural Heritage of India, Ramakrishna Mission Institute of culture Calcutta 1st ed. 1937 Vol. I 53-75.
  
  Note : As per the 1921 Census, the total population of the Indian continent (British Indian Empire plus Sovereign Princely States) = 316 m. while the LSI analysed 290m of these. In 1891 Census, the total population of India contintent was 287m. Out of these only 356 spoke Sanskrit { Grierson }
  
  
  
  
• From: tamacha (@ 62.105.98.245) on: Fri Apr 16 10:09:46 EDT 2004
  
  yes yes yes yes yes
  
  SANSKRIT IS A MONGREL LANGUAGE ACCORDING TO THE HIGH PRIEST OF CHOOOTHIYAS!!!!!!!
  
  HAIL TO THE Aki;la !!!!!!!!!
  
  
  SANSKRIT has 70 words for water that have NOT been DERIVED from ANYOTHER language...when added with a prefix they then amalgamate to another 280 words.....
  
  how refined and intricate......
  
  can you see why they are jealous of our roots....
  
  WHICH OTHER LANGUAGE CAN HAVE SIMILAR CLAIMS TO THIS ONE BY SANSKRIT?
  
  what do you have to say to that one Akila?
  
  
• From: boomerang (@ 82-43-98-165.cable.ubr09.croy.blueyonder.co.uk) on: Sun May 2 12:14:49 EDT 2004
  
  where are you AKILA..........
  
  

Want to post a response?