Topic started by vohsendhan (@ 202.88.137.61) on Sat Feb 2 06:32:50 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.
Terrorists at the NCERT
Authentic historical records show that the Indus Civilisation (c-3000 - c.1500.B.C) was of Bronze Age. The Vedic Aryan invasion and settlement took place post 1500 B. C. The era of Buddha was c.600 - c.500 B.C. The era of Ramayana in which Rama is shown to be calling Buddha a thief, an atheist and a critic of Vedas, belongs to the post -Buddhist era which was also the iron age when stories were created with then existent iron weapons and iron-molded vehicles. Mahabharatha was also compiled during the post-Ramayana age but pre-Alexandrian invasion. Arthasasthra belonged to the post-Alexandrian invasion period. But, the Class VI syllabus of the NCERT has now been modified and undeserved glory is sought to be given to the Vedic culture. The previous NCERT textbook meant for Class VI contained the sentence "the Aryan invasion had pushed back the urban civilization of the Indus era to thousand years". The syllabus devotes an entire unit to the first political terrorist of the world Chanakya and his atrocities are projected as "efforts to bring geographical and political unity". But the Sultans and Mughals are not shown to have brought any geographical or political unity.
Moreover, in the present textbook, "There has been no reference to the early south Indian kingdoms like Cheras, Cholas, Pandyas and even Satavahanas"(NCERT's new text is an insult to historians - Times of India - 2.2.2002). I think that it befits the thinking of the textbook terrorists led by their gang leader Mr.MM Joshi not only to suppress the existence of the southern civilization but also to declare that there are only monkeys in the south. They had already said so in their own history, (the ithihas), the Ramayana.
Dear non- Aryan compatriots, it is your choice whether to succumb to the machinations of the Aryan conspirators or to stand up and challenge them. What is at stake is the future of your children. A Mein Kamph is being re-enacted in India with much more venality by the insurrectionists. Please recall, "Arivudaiyaar Aavadharivaar, arivilaar ahthu arihalladhavar"- Thiruvalluvar.
"To rob a nation of its history is to rob it of the strength and wisdom of the past". In India the robbers are working overtime to weaken the strength of the non-Aryans by destroying their hoary history. "The most powerful weapon of the oppressor is the mind of the oppressed", said the Black civil rights leader Steve Biko in 1976. In India the mind of the people whose history is robbed once again in the 21st century is kept under anesthesia. That suits the robbers. History throws light to keep oneself alert, observant and watchful. But the persons in power seek to put out the light to keep the people in darkness. Only those who want to steal in the house of another person would put out the lights in the house of the latter. The intention of the people who tamper with the Indian history is undoubtedly mischievous.
Lord Bolingbroke says, "History is Philosophy, teaching by example". But, in fact, history is philosophy teaching by warnings also. The Sangh mafia led by Mr. MM Joshi wants to hide precisely the warning episodes of the Indian history from the eyes of the subjugated masses because it wants to keep them subjugated forever. That is why they do not want the subjugated masses to recall and remember the reasons why they became subjugated.
"Serbs still remember that they were crushed by the Ottoman Turks on St Vitus Day, June 28, 1389, leading to five hundred years of Muslim subjugation". It is this remembrance through the history books that prevents them not to repeat any mistake committed by their ancestors earlier which had led to their subjugation.
"Chinese remember, with vivid immediacy, their humiliations at the hands of Europeans and Japanese in the 19th century".
Germany abounds in history, history to be proud of as well as history to be ashamed of. Germany did not think that the past should just be covered up and forgotten. Germany is not ignoring its past. If Germans wanted to erase Nazism from its memory, they would have torn down the remains of Hitler's rally site. Instead, they were leaving the site standing and in open view so that no one would forget. The philosophy of Germans is "Acknowledge the past, but never dwell upon it. Continue to live life and create new history worthy of German pride". "Germans will not let their shame be hidden. They need themselves and the world to know that they have acknowledged the evil that overpowered their nation and will not fall victim again. Germany's efforts to preserve its vast history bless us all with the chance to discover, honor, and reflect upon the possibilities of the human race."
The Indo - Aryans too have a history to be ashamed of. But they want to suppress and supplant it. The wily Mr. MM Joshi, adopting the typical Indo-Aryan technique, says that the textbooks cast aspersions on Jain monks, Sikh Gurus and others. But he does not say that his real intention is to hide the historical facts regarding the policy of apartheid invented and perpetuated by the Indo-Aryans which resulted in the cultural and psychological genocide of the non-Aryans in India.
These protagonists of apartheid do not want to acknowledge the past. They do not want the others to know the facts which led to such state of affairs. Because they want the masses not to learn anything from history which may hamper the attempts of Indo-Aryans in tightening the policy of apartheid even harder.
"Failing to learn the hard lessons of the past necessarily condemns us to repeat its mistakes. Equally self destructive is the ignorance of the past that isolates the individual historically, compelling that person to confront the present as uniquely threatening, and the future as personally hopeless." - Chuck Jorgenson
Remember, remember, and remember. "The future is happening in any case. That much is certain. We can either allow it to happen to us, or we can act upon and shape it. The choice is ours, as usual. " You can continue to be a Shudra forever. You can make the life of your descendants contemptible. You can bequeath them only the life of being hewers of wood and drawers of water. Or you can pave way for them to lead a peaceful life with honest self-respect. If you want your descendants to live as Indians who will be equal in all respects with others, take action now itself to free them from the tentacles of the really - atheistic but outwardly self -appointed - authorized -dealers in "God".
It is a fact that in the West too there had been many embalmers of history who tried to gloss over the sordid slave trade. But they were individual writers and not the organized gangs of insurrectionists occupying portals in governments as we find in India.
There was a time when they invoked Manu to suppress the non-Aryans. Having tasted such power for centuries, they are not able to resist the temptation to arm themselves with a POTO now. They do not care to find ways to elevate the status of a Shudra to the status of a Brahmin. They do not want to forgo the self-assumed title of supremacy in the religious sphere and all its attendant benefits in the temporal sphere. They only want you not to know or talk about it.
That is why in the entire history of India, we do not find anyone other than the Poet Bharathi among them to sincerely come forward to elevate a Shudra to the status of Brahmin. He did it and was condemned by them.
Watching slaves butchered each other was a game enjoyed by the decadent rulers of the Roman Empire- the way lower castes fighting one another while the Brahmins simply watch without doing anything to settle it - the only way to settle it as they know is to discard their own self assumed superior status.
"Today all scholarship is confined to the Brahmins. But unfortunately no Brahmin scholar has so far come forward to play the part of a Voltaire who had the intellectual honesty to rise against the doctrines of the Catholic Church in which he was brought up; nor is one likely to appear on the scene in the future. It is a grave reflection on the scholarship of the Brahmins that they should not have produced a Voltaire.
This will not cause surprise if it is remembered that the Brahmin scholar is only a learned man. He is not an intellectual. There is a world of difference between one who learned and one who is an intellectual. The former is class-conscious and is alive to the interests of his class. The latter is an emancipated being who is free to act without being swayed by class considerations. It is because the Brahmins have been only learned men that they have not produced a Voltaire.
The power and position, which the Brahmins possess, is entirely due to the Hindu Civilization which treats them as supermen and subjects the lower classes to all sorts of disabilities so that they may never rise and challenge or threaten the superiority of the Brahmins over them.
As is natural, every Brahmin is interested in the maintenance of Brahmanic supremacy be he orthodox or unorthodox, be he a priest or a grahastha, be he a scholar or not. How can the Brahmins afford to be Voltaires, A Voltaire among the Brahmins would be a positive danger to the maintenance of a civilization which is contrived to maintain Brahmanic supremacy.
The point is that the intellect of a Brahmin scholar is severely limited by anxiety to preserve his interest. He suffers from this internal limitation as a result of which he does not allow his intellect full play which honesty and integrity demands. For, he fears that it may affect the interests of his class and therefore his own." -B. R. Ambedkar.
They perpetuate the difference. They talk in terms of 'them' and 'us'. They covet everything for themselves. They are concerned only about themselves. What are you going to do about yourself, dear fellow Spartacus?
Tell your friend about this topic