Topic started by abc (@ minesota.yamato.ibm.com) on Mon Oct 22 00:59:38 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

When SIMI is banned people have asked for ban on VHP.
When ISI is banned same people have asked for ban on RSS.
Inshort, they emphasis on tit for tat policy.
So when Mullas rape, pillage, plunder Hindu property(proof- read the followign link), why dont the same people suggest that Mullas also be raped, pillaged, plundered by Hindus.
Similarly if Pakistan and Bangladesh could be Mulla nations, why dont the same people urge India to be decalred as a Hindu nation?
Seems tit for tat policy is only valid when directed against Hindus.
Where are the human right commissions, minority commissions that shout at the top of tehir voice when a Mulla/missionary is attacked?
It is this discrimination (against Hindus) that self respecting Hindus like Shiv Sainiks are against.

Responses:

• From: abc (@ minesota.yamato.ibm.com) on: Mon Oct 22 01:01:47
  
  All major national and international papers are talking about anti-Hindu vilence in Bangladesh.
  http://www.telegraphindia.com/front_pa.htm#head4
  
  I wonder if just voting for Awami League can give so much misery to Hindus, what would their condition be during Partition, Babri riots, etc.
  
  

Want to post a response?