Topic started by Truth Teller (@ mcns87.docsis156.singa.pore.net) on Sun Dec 23 22:46:16 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

Most of the Indians supported U.S. during the attack against Afganistan.

What will you all do when the U.S. supports Pakistan when there is war between India and Pakistan.

You should be aware that U.S. is a cunning country which will side where there is good prosperous for their country.

Sooner or later, you will understand the true colour of U.S.

Responses:

• Old responses
  
• From: Tamil Babe (@ spc-isp-tor-58-23-717.sprint.ca) on: Sat Dec 29 21:38:25
  
  "Even an insignificant Oman bought fighters for 1.5 billion dollars"
  
  Sweet old Oman..The Switzerland of the Gulf... Why does she need fighters?
  
  
• From: Avenger (@ dialpool-210-214-8-200.maa.sify.net) on: Sun Dec 30 12:11:42
  
  I dont think either of the two countries would want a full scale war.
  
  India would take a diplomatic route than a war at this point because the western countries are slightly leaning towards india, and india wouldnt want to lose the foothold it has got.
  
  As for Pakistan, why would they want a war now? They have a good proxy war going on, they get good funding from other rougue muslim countries, they now have a larger group of mujahideen who have been chased from Afgan.
  
  US wouldnt want a war either, because, without the support of india or pakistan or regional countries, the US operation in afganistan would be a total failure. Out of pure selfishness and its never ending desire to play policeman, US at this point wouldnt want a full scale war to start between india and pakistan.
  
  
• From: Sridhar (@ dialup-225-62.bol.net.in) on: Sun Dec 30 13:42:48
  
  IF OBL is in Pakistan? What would be the scenario then ?
  
  
• From: Avenger (@ dialpool-210-214-8-34.maa.sify.net) on: Sun Dec 30 15:09:39
  
  >>If OBL is in Pakistan? What would be the scenario then ?<<
  
  Thats not a problem! if OBL is in pakistan, he will know well to be silent, atleast for a while. But i dont think, he would be that stupid to quit terrains of afgan to seek safe haven in pak(read jalra).
  
  Musharaff may have made the correct political moves by ditching Taliban and siding US, but he became unpopular amongst his fanatic fundamentalist mullahs.
  
  If the mullahs manage to unseat him, then i shudder to think of those idiots itching to trigger a nuke war.
  
  
• From: The True Truth Teller. (@ 192.149.1.187) on: Fri Jan 4 11:42:36
  
  This guy who started the thread is not the real True authentic Truth Teller. This guy is an imposter, with poor knowledge of English grammar.
  
  I have been on vacation for more than a month and have not had a chance to visit DF regularly.
  
  
  
• From: OnDaFritz (@ hse-toronto-ppp167273.sympatico.ca) on: Sun Jan 6 00:58:37
  
  Well HELLO there, USA and INDIA are like best of FRIENDS. Even if PAKISTAN is right in their motives and India, wrong, USA will tend to lean toward India. I'm more worried about Pakistan being put punished by the US b/c, ppl in Islamabad blew up a US Embassy, etc and the Pakistan involvement/supporting of the Taliban doesn't help much. Pakistan is denying the truths of its country and its people. They've only now sided with the US when they realized that they could be the next military target should Bin Laden go to PAkistan and Pakistani Military wouldn't be prepared nor protected by the USA. The people of Pakistan and Pakistan are two different entities. Not all of the Muslims or the Christians/Catholics in Pakistan are anti-Western/anti-USA but, whatever damage has been done will live on a legacy.
  
  
• From: the truth (@ fmoon.singnet.com.sg) on: Fri Jan 18 05:34:05
  
  TERRORISM - US STYLE
  
  Full Text at Website:
  
  http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2001/GA10003.doc.htm
  
  General Assembly Plenary GA/10003
  Tenth Emergency Special Session 20 December 2001
  15th Meeting (PM)
  
  GENERAL ASSEMBLY EMERGENCY SESSION ON OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES
  
  CALLS FOR HALT TO VIOLENCE, ‘MITCHELL REPORT’ IMPLEMENTATION
  
  Also Reiterates Applicability of 1949 Geneva Convention to Territories
  
  Vote on Illegal Israeli Actions
  
  The draft resolution on illegal Israeli actions in occupied East Jerusalem and the rest of occupied Palestinian territory (document A/ES-10/L.8) was adopted by a recorded vote of 133 in favour to 4 against, with 16 abstentions, as follows:
  
  In favour: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Chile, China, Colombia, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian Federation, Saint Lucia, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Syria, Thailand, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
  
  Against: Israel, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, United States.
  
  Abstaining: Australia, Cameroon, Canada, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Georgia, Guatemala, Nauru, Nicaragua, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu.
  
  Absent: Angola, Bahamas, Barbados, Botswana, Chad, Comoros, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Dominica, El Salvador, Fiji, Gambia, Honduras, Kazakhstan, Kiribati, Lesotho, Malawi, Monaco, Palau, Republic of Moldova, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Seychelles, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkmenistan.
  
  
• From: e (@ acad6a60.ipt.aol.com) on: Sat Jan 19 01:10:53
  
  but palestinian land is still occupied by israel, why?
  why cant all these countries stop tthe occupation?
  
  
• From: sheik (@ fcomet.singnet.com.sg) on: Sun Jan 20 22:52:35
  
  e - "why cant all these countries stop tthe occupation?"
  
  sheik - the text is from a United Nations General Assembly draft resolution.
  U.S is a permanent member in the Security Council which gives it a right to veto any resolutions passed.
  Because U.S has vetoed the above resolution, the fact that 133 countries have voted for the draft becomes invalid becomes a non-issue.
  The action of U.S has dragged the Middle-East issue until today
  
  
• From: e (@ 65.115.220.73) on: Tue Jan 22 10:35:02
  
  sheik,
  
  as much as i love US , i dont think any country should get that many rights. well, if ur gonna play by the "book", US could support either palestine or israel, do u know y US chose israel? and its not becase they feel sorry for them!!!! although i think everybody should;)
  
  
• From: the truth (@ constellation.singnet.com.sg) on: Tue Jan 22 22:54:10
  
  Full Text :
  
  http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/ec8db69f77e7a33e052567270057e591/3b58e8d0adf62b5f852561230077c62d!OpenDocument
  
  INTIFADAH (The Uprising)
  
  Conditions in the Palestinian territory during more than 20 years of military occupation, including land confiscation, settlement by Israeli settlers and restrictions of civil liberties, contributed to the eruption of the intifadah. Palestinians from all walks of life - youth, merchants, labourers, women and children - have since been involved in massive demonstrations, economic boycotts, strikes, tax resistance and stone-wielding protests.
  
  The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories, and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) have followed the situation closely.
  
  They have submitted reports on the severe measures, including the use of live ammunition against demonstrators and punitive beatings, adopted by the occupation authorities. Well over 1,000 Palestinians have been killed and tens of thousands injured during the intifadah. Thousands of Palestinians were detained, thousands transferred to prisons in Israel, and many deported from the occupied Palestinian territory. The reports described instances of maltreatment and torture in gaol, lethal use of tear-gas, excessive use of live ammunition, beatings and other severe measures. The occupation authorities had also increasingly resorted to various forms of collective reprisal, such as demolition of houses, imposition of prolonged curfews and restrictive economic measures.
  
  

Want to post a response?